Tukaram S/o Dattatray Gutte vs State Of Maharashtra and other — 57/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order21R11. Status: Report. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
Spl .Dkst - Execution Petition against decree passed in Special Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA050002442024
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
e-Filing Number
18-06-2024
Filing Number
316/2024
Filing Date
19-06-2024
Registration No
57/2024
Registration Date
19-06-2024
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tukaram S/o Dattatray Gutte
Adv. Khobre Sujata P
Respondent(s)
State Of Maharashtra and other
Deputy Collector
Special Executive Engineer
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Report
Awaiting Warrant
Depositing Amount
Awaiting Warrant
Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Report |
| 13-04-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 13-03-2026 | Depositing Amount |
| 12-02-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 05-02-2026 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed by Tukaram challenging a unilateral order against him was allowed by the District Court on February 17, 2025. The court found the State's (Respondents 1 and 2) application for delay in filing was deficient as it failed to explain adequate reasons for the delay or provide substantive arguments for reversing the original order. The petition was granted without imposing penalties on the State, as the court reasoned that fining the State would ultimately burden citizens' finances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed by Tukaram challenging a unilateral order against him was allowed by the District Court on February 17, 2025. The court found the State's (Respondents 1 and 2) application for delay in filing was deficient as it failed to explain adequate reasons for the delay or provide substantive arguments for reversing the original order. The petition was granted without imposing penalties on the State, as the court reasoned that fining the State would ultimately burden citizens' finances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts