Prema s/o Tukaram Phad vs State Of Maharashtra and other — 55/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER21R11. Status: Depositing Amount. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

Spl .Dkst - Execution Petition against decree passed in Special Civil Suit

CNR: MHLA050002422024

Depositing Amount

Next Hearing

20th June 2026

e-Filing Number

18-06-2024

Filing Number

314/2024

Filing Date

19-06-2024

Registration No

55/2024

Registration Date

19-06-2024

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section ORDER21R11

Petitioner(s)

Prema s/o Tukaram Phad

Adv. Khobre Sujata P

Respondent(s)

State Of Maharashtra and other

Deputiy Collector

Special Executive Engineer

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

05-05-2026

Depositing Amount

13-04-2026

Depositing Amount

13-03-2026

Depositing Amount

12-02-2026

Depositing Amount

05-02-2026

Depositing Amount

Interim Orders

17-02-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary of Case 55/2024 (Prema v. State of Maharashtra): The petition filed by respondents (State representatives) seeking to set aside a one-sided order was allowed on 17/02/2025. The court found that the respondents delayed submitting the application without proper explanation and ruled that such delays constitute wastage of court time. The petition was granted on the condition that no further delays occur, and the State was not imposed with penalty costs as sought by the petitioner, as the fine would burden common citizens. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 55/2024 (Prema v. State of Maharashtra): The petition filed by respondents (State representatives) seeking to set aside a one-sided order was allowed on 17/02/2025. The court found that the respondents delayed submitting the application without proper explanation and ruled that such delays constitute wastage of court time. The petition was granted on the condition that no further delays occur, and the State was not imposed with penalty costs as sought by the petitioner, as the fine would burden common citizens. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case