Bhagyashri D/o Dattatray Gutte vs State Of Maharashtra and other — 54/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order21R11. Status: Depositing Amount. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
Spl .Dkst - Execution Petition against decree passed in Special Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA050002412024
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
e-Filing Number
18-06-2024
Filing Number
313/2024
Filing Date
18-06-2024
Registration No
54/2024
Registration Date
19-06-2024
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhagyashri D/o Dattatray Gutte
Adv. Khobre Sujata P
Respondent(s)
State Of Maharashtra and other
Deputiy Collector
Special Executive Engineer
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Depositing Amount
Depositing Amount
Depositing Amount
Depositing Amount
Depositing Amount
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Depositing Amount |
| 13-04-2026 | Depositing Amount |
| 13-03-2026 | Depositing Amount |
| 12-02-2026 | Depositing Amount |
| 05-02-2026 | Depositing Amount |
Interim Orders
Case 54/2024 Summary The petition filed by Bhagyashri challenging a unilateral order against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents was allowed. The court granted the special application filed by respondents (State representatives) condoning their delay in filing and appearing before the court, finding that accepting the late application without imposing penalties would constitute wasteful litigation practices. No fine was imposed on the State as doing so would burden ordinary citizens. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 54/2024 Summary The petition filed by Bhagyashri challenging a unilateral order against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents was allowed. The court granted the special application filed by respondents (State representatives) condoning their delay in filing and appearing before the court, finding that accepting the late application without imposing penalties would constitute wasteful litigation practices. No fine was imposed on the State as doing so would burden ordinary citizens. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts