Bhagirthabai w/o Balaji Kature vs Sub Division Officer, Ahmedpur and othr 1 Advocate - Bhurkapalle Ravindra E — 11/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA050002302021
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
146/2021
Filing Date
22-07-2021
Registration No
11/2021
Registration Date
22-07-2021
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhagirthabai w/o Balaji Kature
Adv. Kamble Deepak M
Respondent(s)
Sub Division Officer, Ahmedpur and othr 1 Advocate - Bhurkapalle Ravindra E
Namdev s/o Mahadu Akangire
Adv. Uppe Viresh M_LAPA55
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 30-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 11/2021 The petition filed by Bhagirthabai was allowed. The court upheld the petitioner's right to change her counsel of choice and proceed with the case. The court rejected the previous advocate's demand for additional fees and the requirement of a no-objection certificate, holding that a client has absolute freedom to engage any advocate they wish and that no consent from former counsel is necessary for subsequent matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 11/2021 The petition filed by Bhagirthabai was allowed. The court upheld the petitioner's right to change her counsel of choice and proceed with the case. The court rejected the previous advocate's demand for additional fees and the requirement of a no-objection certificate, holding that a client has absolute freedom to engage any advocate they wish and that no consent from former counsel is necessary for subsequent matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts