Raheba S/o Gyanoba Bansode vs Ganpati S/o Gyanoba Bansode and other 5 Advocate - Kale Santosh Bhagwatrao — 6/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: List of Witness. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

List of Witness Next hearing 23-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHLA050001202025

e-Filing Number

05-04-2025

Filing Number

120/2025

Filing Date

07-Apr-2025

Registration No

6/2025

Registration Date

07-Apr-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Raheba S/o Gyanoba Bansode

    Adv. Patil Hemantkumar R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ganpati S/o Gyanoba Bansode and other 5 Advocate - Kale Santosh Bhagwatrao

  2. 2.Daivshala W/o Gyanoba Bansode

  3. 3.Sidhenath S/o Ganpati bansode

    Adv. Kale Santosh Bhagwatrao

  4. 4.Venkat S/o Gyanoba Bansode

  5. 5.Pralhad S/o Gyanoba Bansode

  6. 6.Shantabai W/o Namdev Gadekar

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: Raheba v. Ganpati and Others (Case 6/2025) Raheba filed a partition petition seeking division of joint family properties, claiming a 1/5 undivided share. The properties in dispute include land plots and residential properties in Ahmednagar and other locations. Respondents (Ganpati, his wife, their son, and others) contested, arguing the properties were purchased individually by Respondent No. 1 and that they form a separate family unit, not a joint family with Raheba. Order: The petition was allowed. The court found Raheba's claim valid and directed that disputed properties be deposited with a third party pending final adjudication. The respondents must maintain status quo and not transfer the properties. Court costs are included in final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Report

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  9. 02-Feb-2026

    Report

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  10. 08-Jan-2026

    Report

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  11. 05-Dec-2025

    Report

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  12. 15-Nov-2025

    Report

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  13. 27-Oct-2025

    Report

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  14. 19-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  15. 25-Aug-2025

    Report

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  16. 22-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  17. 01-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  18. 10-Jun-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  19. 10-Jun-2025

    Report

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  20. 08-May-2025

    Report

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur

  21. 08-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 07-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Raheba v. Ganpati and Others (Case 6/2025) Raheba filed a partition petition seeking division of joint family properties, claiming a 1/5 undivided share. The properties in dispute include land plots and residential properties in Ahmednagar and other locations. Respondents (Ganpati, his wife, their son, and others) contested, arguing the properties were purchased individually by Respondent No. 1 and that they form a separate family unit, not a joint family with Raheba. Order: The petition was allowed. The court found Raheba's claim valid and directed that disputed properties be deposited with a third party pending final adjudication. The respondents must maintain status quo and not transfer the properties. Court costs are included in final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case