Raheba S/o Gyanoba Bansode vs Ganpati S/o Gyanoba Bansode and other 5 Advocate - Kale Santosh Bhagwatrao — 6/2025

Case Summary: Raheba v. Ganpati and Others (Case 6/2025) Raheba filed a partition petition seeking division of joint family properties, claiming a 1/5 undivided share. The properties in dispute include land plots and residential properties in Ahmednagar and other locations. Respondents (Ganpati, his wife, their son, and others) contested, arguing the properties were purchased individually by Respondent No. 1 and that they form a separate family unit, not a joint family with Raheba. Order: The petition was allowed. The court found Raheba's claim valid and directed that disputed properties be deposited with a third party pending final adjudication. The respondents must maintain status quo and not transfer the properties. Court costs are included in final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.