Abdul s/o Hafijkhan Jahankhan vs The State of Maharashtra Through The Collector, Latur and other — 29/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.
Spl .Dkst - Execution Petition against decree passed in Special Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA050001162019
Next Hearing
16th July 2026
Filing Number
108/2019
Filing Date
13-03-2019
Registration No
29/2019
Registration Date
13-03-2019
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Abdul s/o Hafijkhan Jahankhan
Adv. Hippargekar Nagesh A
Abdul Gani Jahankhan Patel(Legal Heir) 2.
Farhat Abdul Gani Patel 2.
Abdul Khadir Abdul Gani Patel 2.
Shakera Abdul Gani Patel 2.
Mehraj Abdul Gani Patel 2.
Humera Abdul Gani Patel 2.
Imran Abdul Gani Patel 2.
Irfan Abdul Gani Patel 2.
Jeshan Abdul Gani Patel 2.
Rubina Abdul Gani Patel 2.
Heena Abdul Gani Patel
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through The Collector, Latur and other
Abdul Gafur Jahankhan Patel
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Steps
Report
Awaiting Warrant
Depositing Amount
Depositing Amount
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | Steps |
| 20-04-2026 | Report |
| 16-03-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 21-02-2026 | Depositing Amount |
| 28-01-2026 | Depositing Amount |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 29/2019 Outcome: The petition was allowed. The court set aside a unilateral order dated 26/08/2019 passed against the petitioner by Respondent 1 (Collector, Latur). The court found that the State's delay in appearing before the court was unreasonable, and that passing an ex-parte order against the petitioner would be unjust. The court held the exaggerated claims in the petition to be unfounded and granted relief to the petitioner accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 29/2019 Outcome: The petition was allowed. The court set aside a unilateral order dated 26/08/2019 passed against the petitioner by Respondent 1 (Collector, Latur). The court found that the State's delay in appearing before the court was unreasonable, and that passing an ex-parte order against the petitioner would be unjust. The court held the exaggerated claims in the petition to be unfounded and granted relief to the petitioner accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts