Anusaya alies Sulekha w/o Mohanrao Jagtap vs The State of Maharashtra, Through Dist. Govt. Pleader Ahmedpur and other 4 Advocate - Patil Mahesh K_DGP — 7/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA050000602019
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
58/2019
Filing Date
07-02-2019
Registration No
7/2019
Registration Date
07-02-2019
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anusaya alies Sulekha w/o Mohanrao Jagtap
Adv. Sabne Devidas A
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra, Through Dist. Govt. Pleader Ahmedpur and other 4 Advocate - Patil Mahesh K_DGP
The Princhipal Shivaji Mahavidyalaya, Udgir
Adv. Shelke Rajendra K
The Joint Director Higher Education Nanded Region Nanded
The Accountant General, Pension Branch Office, Nagpur
Janabai w/o Mohanrao Jagtap
Adv. Ghogre Dhanraj L
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Arguments
Arguments
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-05-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 30-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 27-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 7/2019 Case: Anusaya (Sulekha) v. The State of Maharashtra and Others Outcome: Petition dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's claims, finding that the witness testimony was unreliable and contradictory. The witness admitted during cross-examination that he had no personal knowledge of key facts and had based his affidavit on hearsay from the petitioner. The court determined the evidence insufficient to support the petitioner's allegations. Date: 04/05/2026, Ahmedpur Court This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 7/2019 Case: Anusaya (Sulekha) v. The State of Maharashtra and Others Outcome: Petition dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's claims, finding that the witness testimony was unreliable and contradictory. The witness admitted during cross-examination that he had no personal knowledge of key facts and had based his affidavit on hearsay from the petitioner. The court determined the evidence insufficient to support the petitioner's allegations. Date: 04/05/2026, Ahmedpur Court This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts