Sanghamitra W/o Rahul Tigote vs Mastan S/o Magdum Beg — 8/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order21Rule11. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.
MACP. Dkst. - Execution of Award in Motor Accident Claims
CNR: MHLA040004742025
e-Filing Number
09-12-2025
Filing Number
228/2025
Filing Date
10-Dec-2025
Registration No
8/2025
Registration Date
10-Dec-2025
Court
Additional District Court, Ahmedpur
Judge
1-District Judge 1
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sanghamitra W/o Rahul Tigote
Adv. Kamble Satish S
-
2.Avani D/o Rahulji Tigote u/g of Mother
Adv. Kamble Satish S
-
3.Ayush S/o Rahulji Tigote u/g of Mother
Adv. Kamble Satish S
-
4.Kamal W/o Venkatrao Tigote
Adv. Kamble Satish S
-
5.Venkatrao S/o Sambhaji Tigote
Adv. Kamble Satish S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mastan S/o Magdum Beg
-
2.Ismail S/o Mainoddin Shaikh
-
3.ICICI Lombard General Insurance Com Ltd
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmedpur disposed of the execution petition filed by Sanghmitra and others against Mastan and others on 16.03.2026, accepting the decree holder's statement that the cause of action had been satisfied. The tribunal found that the underlying claim had been resolved and accordingly closed the execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge 1
-
24-Feb-2026
Steps_Unready
District Judge 1
-
27-Jan-2026
Steps_Unready
District Judge 1
-
20-Jan-2026
Steps_Unready
District Judge 1
-
11-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 8/2025
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmedpur disposed of the execution petition filed by Sanghmitra and others against Mastan and others on 16.03.2026, accepting the decree holder's statement that the cause of action had been satisfied. The tribunal found that the underlying claim had been resolved and accordingly closed the execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts