Limbaji s/o Ramrao Yelnare vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - Patil Mahesh K_DGP11 — 20/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 17th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHLA040000902026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
53/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
20/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Additional District Court, Ahmedpur
Judge
1-District Judge 1
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL REFUSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
51
Police Station
Kingaon
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Limbaji s/o Ramrao Yelnare
Adv. KSHIRSAGAR BHARATBHOOSHAN BHIMRAOJI
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Advocate - Patil Mahesh K_DGP11
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1
Disposed
Order
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Order |
| 13-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 12-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 11-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Limbaji v. State (20/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Limbaji Ramrao Yelnare's bail application for alleged sexual assault of a 9-year-old girl. The court found sufficient evidence that the accused took the child to a cattle shed and committed acts constituting grave sexual assault, including touching her inappropriately and attempting to remove her clothing. The court rejected the accused's defense of false allegations based on a prior verbal dispute, finding no circumstances on record supporting falsification, and concluded no grounds existed for bail while investigation remained ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Limbaji v. State (20/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Limbaji Ramrao Yelnare's bail application for alleged sexual assault of a 9-year-old girl. The court found sufficient evidence that the accused took the child to a cattle shed and committed acts constituting grave sexual assault, including touching her inappropriately and attempting to remove her clothing. The court rejected the accused's defense of false allegations based on a prior verbal dispute, finding no circumstances on record supporting falsification, and concluded no grounds existed for bail while investigation remained ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts