State of Maharashtra vs Archana w/o Parshant, Gaikwad Advocate - Hippargekar Nagesh A — 10/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 05th August 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHLA040000782026
Next Hearing
05th August 2026
Filing Number
47/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
10/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
Additional District Court, Ahmedpur
Judge
1-District Judge 1
FIR Details
FIR Number
822
Police Station
Ahmedpur
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Patil Mahesh K_DGP11
Respondent(s)
Archana w/o Parshant, Gaikwad Advocate - Hippargekar Nagesh A
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1
Evidence
Evidence
Hearing
Hearing
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 13-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 12-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Archana Gaikwad (10/2026) Bail was GRANTED to accused Archana Prashant Gaikwad on March 13, 2026. Archana was charged under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (murder) in the death of her husband Prashant Gaikwad. The court found that while matrimonial discord and head injury existed, the circumstantial evidence—including the deceased's intoxication and lack of premeditation—indicated culpable homicide rather than murder, warranting bail on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with equal surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Archana Gaikwad (10/2026) Bail was GRANTED to accused Archana Prashant Gaikwad on March 13, 2026. Archana was charged under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (murder) in the death of her husband Prashant Gaikwad. The court found that while matrimonial discord and head injury existed, the circumstantial evidence—including the deceased's intoxication and lack of premeditation—indicated culpable homicide rather than murder, warranting bail on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with equal surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts