State of Maharashtra vs Dasrao s/o Laxman Bhadade and othr 1 Advocate - Kshirsagar Bharatbhushen B — 1/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,115,352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHLA040000052025
Filing Number
4/2025
Filing Date
03-01-2025
Registration No
1/2025
Registration Date
03-01-2025
Court
Additional District Court, Ahmedpur
Judge
1-District Judge 1
Decision Date
18th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
297
Police Station
Kingaon
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Patil Mahesh K_DGP11
Respondent(s)
Dasrao s/o Laxman Bhadade and othr 1 Advocate - Kshirsagar Bharatbhushen B
Baliram s/o Baban Jadhav
Adv. Kshirsagar Bharatbhushen B
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-05-2026 | Judgment |
| 20-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Special Judge acquitted both accused of atrocity charges, finding the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key grounds: no valid caste certificate proved the victim belonged to a Scheduled Tribe; the prosecution's account that accused entered a fully wire-fenced hotel to take tea was inherently improbable; medical evidence (simple abrasion) contradicted claims of bangle-cut injuries; and credible doubt arose from the defense narrative that the case stemmed from a dispute over illegal liquor sales. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Special Judge acquitted both accused of atrocity charges, finding the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key grounds: no valid caste certificate proved the victim belonged to a Scheduled Tribe; the prosecution's account that accused entered a fully wire-fenced hotel to take tea was inherently improbable; medical evidence (simple abrasion) contradicted claims of bangle-cut injuries; and credible doubt arose from the defense narrative that the case stemmed from a dispute over illegal liquor sales. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts