Kuldeep Vijaykumar Joshi vs Kamlakar Digambarrao Jadhav And Another — 318/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition

CNR: MHLA010055352025

Evidence

Next Hearing

20th June 2026

e-Filing Number

12-12-2025

Filing Number

4090/2025

Filing Date

15-12-2025

Registration No

318/2025

Registration Date

17-12-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court , Latur

Judge

3-District Judge 2nd Latur

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Kuldeep Vijaykumar Joshi

Adv. Patel Nazir G

Respondent(s)

Kamlakar Digambarrao Jadhav And Another

ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. Through Branch Manager

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District Judge 2nd Latur

23-04-2026

Evidence

07-04-2026

Evidence

13-03-2026

Evidence

16-02-2026

Issues

27-01-2026

Appearance

Interim Orders

07-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case 318/2025 Summary: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) at Latur allowed Respondent No. 2's application to set aside an ex-parte order dated 16.02.2026 passed against them. The court found that while Respondent No. 2 was duly served and given sufficient opportunity, their delayed appearance was unintentional due to lack of instructions from their client, and since the hearing had not yet commenced, setting aside the order would allow proper adjudication on merits. Respondent No. 2 was ordered to pay Rs. 500 costs to the claimant by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 318/2025 Summary: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) at Latur allowed Respondent No. 2's application to set aside an ex-parte order dated 16.02.2026 passed against them. The court found that while Respondent No. 2 was duly served and given sufficient opportunity, their delayed appearance was unintentional due to lack of instructions from their client, and since the hearing had not yet commenced, setting aside the order would allow proper adjudication on merits. Respondent No. 2 was ordered to pay Rs. 500 costs to the claimant by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Latur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case