Sagar Omprakash Bhutada vs Dr. Gayatri Pradip Solanki — 52/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 389. Status: Awaiting Warrant. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

Awaiting Warrant Next hearing 05-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Cri.Appeal - Criminal Appeal

CNR: MHLA010052342025

e-Filing Number

25-11-2025

Filing Number

1455/2025

Filing Date

26-Nov-2025

Registration No

52/2025

Registration Date

26-Nov-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court , Latur

Judge

3-District Judge 2nd Latur

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 389

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

1.Sagar Omprakash Bhutada

Adv. Toshniwal Lavkumar D

Respondent(s)

1.Dr. Gayatri Pradip Solanki

Case History

05-Jun-2026

Next hearingPending
12-May-2026

Awaiting Warrant

District Judge 2nd Latur
23-Apr-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Summary of Criminal Appeal No. 52/2025 The court revoked the suspension of appellant Sagar Omprakash Bhutada's imprisonment sentence and issued an arrest warrant against him for non-compliance with court orders. The appellant had failed to deposit 20% of the compensation amount within the stipulated 60-day period as required under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, despite filing an affidavit promising compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
23-Apr-2026

Awaiting Warrant

District Judge 2nd Latur
30-Mar-2026

Compliance

District Judge 2nd Latur
13-Mar-2026

Compliance

District Judge 2nd Latur
12-Jan-2026

Notice_Unready

District Judge 1st Latur
28-Nov-2025

Order on ExhibitView PDF
28-Nov-2025

Notice_Unready

District Judge 1st Latur
26-Nov-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
26-Nov-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 52/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Criminal Appeal No. 52/2025 The court revoked the suspension of appellant Sagar Omprakash Bhutada's imprisonment sentence and issued an arrest warrant against him for non-compliance with court orders. The appellant had failed to deposit 20% of the compensation amount within the stipulated 60-day period as required under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, despite filing an affidavit promising compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.