Vitthalrao Mukundrao Deshpande vs Shailja Vitthalrao Deshpande Advocate - Mande Sujit Vikramaditya — 89/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHLA010051092025

e-Filing Number

18-11-2025

Filing Number

1420/2025

Filing Date

18-Nov-2025

Registration No

89/2025

Registration Date

19-Nov-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court , Latur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge Latur

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vitthalrao Mukundrao Deshpande

    Adv. Badde Nagnath B

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shailja Vitthalrao Deshpande Advocate - Mande Sujit Vikramaditya

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Sessions Court rejected Vitthalrao's application to transfer a Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act case from the 6th JMFC Latur, finding no credible evidence of judicial bias. The court held that an unfavorable order alone does not establish bias, and transfer powers must be exercised sparingly only in exceptional circumstances where fair justice is genuinely imperiled. The applicant failed to demonstrate concrete material supporting his apprehension and was ordered to pay ₹10,000 as exemplary costs for filing a frivolous and vexatious application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Latur

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Latur

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Latur

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Latur

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Latur

  8. 14-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Latur

  9. 05-Feb-2026

    Notice_Unready

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Latur

  10. 08-Jan-2026

    Notice_Unready

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Latur

  11. 24-Dec-2025

    Steps

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Latur

  12. 28-Nov-2025

    Notice_Unready

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Latur

  13. 19-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 18-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 89/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court rejected Vitthalrao's application to transfer a Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act case from the 6th JMFC Latur, finding no credible evidence of judicial bias. The court held that an unfavorable order alone does not establish bias, and transfer powers must be exercised sparingly only in exceptional circumstances where fair justice is genuinely imperiled. The applicant failed to demonstrate concrete material supporting his apprehension and was ordered to pay ₹10,000 as exemplary costs for filing a frivolous and vexatious application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case