Chandbi Hussain alias Husen Shaikh vs Vilas Ramratan Wadekar — 338/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 08-Jun-2026 this date has passed

M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition

CNR: MHLA010050082023

e-Filing Number

13-12-2023

Filing Number

3719/2023

Filing Date

13-Dec-2023

Registration No

338/2023

Registration Date

14-Dec-2023

Court

District and Sessions Court , Latur

Judge

3-District Judge 2nd Latur

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chandbi Hussain alias Husen Shaikh

    Adv. Kitekar Kirankumar S

  2. 2.Mohmad Hussain alias Husen Shaikh

    Adv. Kitekar Kirankumar S

  3. 3.Farhana Hussain alias Husen Shaikh

    Adv. Kitekar Kirankumar S

  4. 4.Minaj Hussain alias Husen Shaikh

    Adv. Kitekar Kirankumar S

  5. 5.Arbaj Hussain alias Husen Shaikh

    Adv. Kitekar Kirankumar S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vilas Ramratan Wadekar

  2. 2.Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

    Case 338/2023 Summary This motor accident case before the District Judge (Motor Accident Authority), Latur involved petitioners Chandbi Hussain, Mohmad Hussain, and Farhana Hussain versus respondents Vilas Ramratan Wadekar and Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd. The court completed examination and cross-examination of witnesses, with documentary evidence including the FIR, post-mortem report, scene inspection panchnama, vehicle registration, and insurance policy being admitted. The petition was dismissed in full and no relief was granted to the petitioners. The order was dated 20/04/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 2nd Latur

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 2nd Latur

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 2nd Latur

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge 2nd Latur

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Issues

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Latur

  8. 22-Dec-2025

    Issues

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Latur

  9. 11-Nov-2025

    Issues

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Latur

  10. 01-Oct-2025

    Issues

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Latur

  11. 12-Aug-2025

    Issues

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Latur

  12. 22-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Latur

  13. 29-Apr-2025

    Issues

    District Judge -4 Latur

  14. 18-Feb-2025

    Issues

    District Judge -4 Latur

  15. 30-Nov-2024

    Issues

    District Judge -4 Latur

  16. 08-Oct-2024

    Issues

    District Judge -4 Latur

  17. 21-Sep-2024

    Issues

    District Judge -4 Latur

  18. 13-Aug-2024

    Issues

    District Judge -4 Latur

  19. 12-Jul-2024

    Issues

    District Judge -4 Latur

  20. 18-May-2024

    Issues

    District Judge -4 Latur

  21. 12-Apr-2024

    Written Statement

    District Judge -4 Latur

  22. 18-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    District Judge -4 Latur

  23. 16-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

    District Judge -4 Latur

  24. 19-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    District Judge -4 Latur

  25. 15-Dec-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge -4 Latur

  26. 14-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 13-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 338/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case 338/2023 Summary This motor accident case before the District Judge (Motor Accident Authority), Latur involved petitioners Chandbi Hussain, Mohmad Hussain, and Farhana Hussain versus respondents Vilas Ramratan Wadekar and Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd. The court completed examination and cross-examination of witnesses, with documentary evidence including the FIR, post-mortem report, scene inspection panchnama, vehicle registration, and insurance policy being admitted. The petition was dismissed in full and no relief was granted to the petitioners. The order was dated 20/04/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case