National Highway vs Harikishan Motilal Loya Advocate - Dange Irfan A — 67/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.

Arbitration Case

CNR: MHLA010044882025

Compliance

Next Hearing

04th July 2026

e-Filing Number

10-09-2025

Filing Number

3459/2025

Filing Date

15-09-2025

Registration No

67/2025

Registration Date

18-09-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court , Latur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge Latur

Acts & Sections

ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT Section 34

Petitioner(s)

National Highway

Adv. Ambekar Srinivas B

Respondent(s)

Harikishan Motilal Loya Advocate - Dange Irfan A

Shakuntala Harikishan Loya

Adv. Dange Irfan A

Sanjay Harikishan Loya

Adv. Dange Irfan A

Narayan Harikishan Loya

Adv. Dange Irfan A

The Competent Authority and Dy Collector

Adv. Deshpande Santosh V_DGP1

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge Latur

29-04-2026

Compliance

24-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

22-04-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

18-04-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

13-03-2026

Steps

Interim Orders

29-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

The National Highway Authority of India's application for stay of an arbitrator's award in a land compensation case was partially granted. Execution and operation of the award dated 16/04/2025 is stayed on the condition that the applicant deposits 50% of the compensation amount in court within 3 months. The court balanced the substantial rights of the applicant against protecting the respondent's interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The National Highway Authority of India's application for stay of an arbitrator's award in a land compensation case was partially granted. Execution and operation of the award dated 16/04/2025 is stayed on the condition that the applicant deposits 50% of the compensation amount in court within 3 months. The court balanced the substantial rights of the applicant against protecting the respondent's interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Latur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case