National Highway vs Harikishan Motilal Loya Advocate - Dange Irfan A — 66/2025
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.
Arbitration Case
CNR: MHLA010044862025
Next Hearing
04th July 2026
e-Filing Number
10-09-2025
Filing Number
3458/2025
Filing Date
15-09-2025
Registration No
66/2025
Registration Date
18-09-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court , Latur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge Latur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
National Highway
Adv. Ambekar Srinivas B
Respondent(s)
Harikishan Motilal Loya Advocate - Dange Irfan A
Shakuntala Harikishan Loya
Adv. Dange Irfan A
Sanjay Harikishan Loya
Adv. Dange Irfan A
Narayan Harikishan Loya
Adv. Dange Irfan A
The Competent Authority and Dy Collector
Adv. Deshpande Santosh V_DGP1
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge Latur
Compliance
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 24-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 22-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 18-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 13-03-2026 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 66/2025 Outcome: Stay of execution granted with conditions. The court stayed the execution and operation of an arbitrator's award in a land compensation case (dated 16/04/2025) on condition that National Highway Authority deposit 50% of the compensation amount in court within 3 months. The court balanced NHAI's substantial rights in the Section 34 proceedings against protecting respondent interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 66/2025 Outcome: Stay of execution granted with conditions. The court stayed the execution and operation of an arbitrator's award in a land compensation case (dated 16/04/2025) on condition that National Highway Authority deposit 50% of the compensation amount in court within 3 months. The court balanced NHAI's substantial rights in the Section 34 proceedings against protecting respondent interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts