National Highways Authority of India, vs The Competent Authority and Sub Divisional Officer ETc. — 432/2021

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED / REJECTED AFTER FULL TRIAL / HEARING on 13th April 2026.

Arbitration Case

CNR: MHLA010040502021

Case disposed

Filing Number

2942/2021

Filing Date

22-12-2021

Registration No

432/2021

Registration Date

22-12-2021

Court

District and Sessions Court , Latur

Judge

4-Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.S.J., Latur

Decision Date

13th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED / REJECTED AFTER FULL TRIAL / HEARING

Acts & Sections

ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT Section 34
National Highways Act Section 3G

Petitioner(s)

National Highways Authority of India,

Adv. Akkangire Pradip Shankarrao

Respondent(s)

The Competent Authority and Sub Divisional Officer ETc.

Ajaj Ahmedsab Sayyed

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.S.J., Latur

13-04-2026

Disposed

06-04-2026

Judgment

25-03-2026

Judgment

13-03-2026

Judgment

07-03-2026

Judgment

Final Orders / Judgements

13-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: NHAI v. Competent Authority & Ajaj Ahmedsab Sayyed (432/2021) The District Court dismissed NHAI's application to set aside an arbitrator's award fixing land compensation at Rs.1,964/sq.m for 155 sq.m of agricultural land acquired for NH-361 widening in Ausa village. The court rejected NHAI's claims that the award violated public policy by being excessive compared to Ready Reckoner rates, finding the arbitrator properly considered 685 sale deeds and followed statutory compensation guidelines under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: NHAI v. Competent Authority & Ajaj Ahmedsab Sayyed (432/2021) The District Court dismissed NHAI's application to set aside an arbitrator's award fixing land compensation at Rs.1,964/sq.m for 155 sq.m of agricultural land acquired for NH-361 widening in Ausa village. The court rejected NHAI's claims that the award violated public policy by being excessive compared to Ready Reckoner rates, finding the arbitrator properly considered 685 sale deeds and followed statutory compensation guidelines under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Latur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case