Sukhdev Pandhari Mane other 1 vs Santosh Gill Earthmovers Pvt Ltd through Prop Santosh Gill other — 269/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 30th March 2026.
M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition
CNR: MHLA010040302024
e-Filing Number
24-10-2024
Filing Number
2894/2024
Filing Date
25-10-2024
Registration No
269/2024
Registration Date
04-11-2024
Court
District and Sessions Court , Latur
Judge
4-Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.S.J., Latur
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sukhdev Pandhari Mane other 1
Adv. Survase Kajal ankush
Anjana Sukhdev Mane
Adv. Survase Kajal ankush
Respondent(s)
Santosh Gill Earthmovers Pvt Ltd through Prop Santosh Gill other
Shamsundar Jandail Singh
Go Digit General Insurance Co Ltd
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.S.J., Latur
Disposed
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 16-01-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 15-01-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 28-11-2025 | Awaiting Notice |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dismissed the claim petition filed by Sukhdev Pandhari Mane and Anjana Sukhdev Mane (parents of deceased Pragati Mangesh Kamble) against Santosh Gill Earthmovers and Go Digit General Insurance Co. Ltd. The tribunal found the petition not tenable because a previous claim (MACP No. 130/2024) filed by the deceased's in-laws had already been settled with a compromise, and compensation had been paid by the insurance company. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dismissed the claim petition filed by Sukhdev Pandhari Mane and Anjana Sukhdev Mane (parents of deceased Pragati Mangesh Kamble) against Santosh Gill Earthmovers and Go Digit General Insurance Co. Ltd. The tribunal found the petition not tenable because a previous claim (MACP No. 130/2024) filed by the deceased's in-laws had already been settled with a compromise, and compensation had been paid by the insurance company. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts