National Highways Authority of India, vs The Competent Authority and Sub Divisional Officer — 371/2021
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.
Arbitration Case
CNR: MHLA010035062021
Filing Number
2549/2021
Filing Date
10-11-2021
Registration No
371/2021
Registration Date
10-11-2021
Court
District and Sessions Court , Latur
Judge
5-Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
National Highways Authority of India,
Adv. Akkangire Pradip Shankarrao
Respondent(s)
The Competent Authority and Sub Divisional Officer
Kamalkar Ghanshyam Mainderkar
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 13-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 04-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 26-02-2026 | Compliance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: NHAI v. Competent Authority (371/2021) The Adhoc District Judge-2 Latur dismissed NHAI's Section 34 application seeking to set aside an arbitrator's award of Rs.2,550/sq.m compensation for agricultural land acquired for National Highway No.361 widening. The court found the arbitrator properly evaluated 955 sale deeds, correctly classified the land as having non-agricultural potential given its highway proximity, and reasonably determined the compensation rate within statutory guidelines, rejecting NHAI's contentions of public policy violation and patent illegality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: NHAI v. Competent Authority (371/2021) The Adhoc District Judge-2 Latur dismissed NHAI's Section 34 application seeking to set aside an arbitrator's award of Rs.2,550/sq.m compensation for agricultural land acquired for National Highway No.361 widening. The court found the arbitrator properly evaluated 955 sale deeds, correctly classified the land as having non-agricultural potential given its highway proximity, and reasonably determined the compensation rate within statutory guidelines, rejecting NHAI's contentions of public policy violation and patent illegality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts