Sudhir Bhagwat Dede vs Shivaji Balasaheb Deshmukh and 2 Advocate - Patil Abhijit Ashok — 219/2021
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 02nd May 2026.
M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition
CNR: MHLA010030942021
Filing Number
2312/2021
Filing Date
23-09-2021
Registration No
219/2021
Registration Date
23-09-2021
Court
District and Sessions Court , Latur
Judge
5-Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sudhir Bhagwat Dede
Adv. Jadhav Mahesh B
Respondent(s)
Shivaji Balasaheb Deshmukh and 2 Advocate - Patil Abhijit Ashok
Pandurang Lala Bhandange
The Reliance General Insurance Company.Ltd.
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 04-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: M.A.C.P. No. 219/2021 Court Decision: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Latur partly allowed the claimant's petition, awarding Rs.7,98,000 in total compensation against all three respondents (driver, vehicle owner, and insurer) jointly and severally. The court found the motorcycle rider guilty of negligent driving causing the claimant's grievous injuries including a fractured femur, and rejected the insurer's defense of policy breach since the driver held a valid license. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: M.A.C.P. No. 219/2021 Court Decision: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Latur partly allowed the claimant's petition, awarding Rs.7,98,000 in total compensation against all three respondents (driver, vehicle owner, and insurer) jointly and severally. The court found the motorcycle rider guilty of negligent driving causing the claimant's grievous injuries including a fractured femur, and rejected the insurer's defense of policy breach since the driver held a valid license. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts