Bharat Shivshankar Chounde vs chandrabhan Rama Bhalekar other 2 Advocate - Pande Sanjay B — 76/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order7rule1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal

CNR: MHLA010030932024

e-Filing Number

10-09-2024

Filing Number

2157/2024

Filing Date

10-Sep-2024

Registration No

76/2024

Registration Date

12-Sep-2024

Court

District and Sessions Court , Latur

Judge

4-Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section order7rule1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bharat Shivshankar Chounde

    Adv. Mane Baliram P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.chandrabhan Rama Bhalekar other 2 Advocate - Pande Sanjay B

  2. 2.malhari chandrabhan bhalekar

  3. 3.basling shivshankar chounde

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: Bharat Shivshankar Chounde v. Chandrabhan Rama Bhalekar (MCA 76/2024) The Appellate Court dismissed Bharat's (Defendant No. 2) appeal against the trial court's temporary injunction order. The court found that the two respondents (Chandrabhan and Malhari Bhalekar) established a prima facie case of ownership over agricultural land totaling 66 rupees (units of measurement) through registered sale deeds dated 2018-2019, despite minor discrepancies in the listed Gat (plot) numbers. The court confirmed the injunction restraining the appellant from interfering with the respondents' peaceful possession of the disputed property pending final suit determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Judgment

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Judgment

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur

  8. 04-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur

  10. 23-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur

  11. 09-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur

  12. 11-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur

  13. 08-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur

  14. 14-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur

  15. 16-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur

  16. 24-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge 2nd Latur

  17. 28-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge 2nd Latur

  18. 31-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge -4 Latur

  19. 19-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge 2nd Latur

  20. 17-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge -3 Latur

  21. 27-Feb-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge -3 Latur

  22. 07-Jan-2025

    Ex-Parte Order

    District Judge -3 Latur

  23. 29-Nov-2024

    Ex-Parte Order

    District Judge -3 Latur

  24. 24-Oct-2024

    Ex-Parte Order

    District Judge -3 Latur

  25. 12-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 10-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 76/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Bharat Shivshankar Chounde v. Chandrabhan Rama Bhalekar (MCA 76/2024) The Appellate Court dismissed Bharat's (Defendant No. 2) appeal against the trial court's temporary injunction order. The court found that the two respondents (Chandrabhan and Malhari Bhalekar) established a prima facie case of ownership over agricultural land totaling 66 rupees (units of measurement) through registered sale deeds dated 2018-2019, despite minor discrepancies in the listed Gat (plot) numbers. The court confirmed the injunction restraining the appellant from interfering with the respondents' peaceful possession of the disputed property pending final suit determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case