State of Maharashtra vs Datta s/o. Baburao Ade and 2 Advocate - Chapule Mahadev S — 85/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,504,506,143,147,148. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 15th May 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHLA010029382023
Filing Number
848/2023
Filing Date
25-07-2023
Registration No
85/2023
Registration Date
25-07-2023
Court
District and Sessions Court , Latur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge Latur
Decision Date
15th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
22
Police Station
Gategaon Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Mundada Sanjaykumar R_DGP9
Respondent(s)
Datta s/o. Baburao Ade and 2 Advocate - Chapule Mahadev S
Balaji s/o. Rama Chavan
Adv. Chapule Mahadev S
Anita w/o. Balaji Chavan
Adv. Chapule Mahadev S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge Latur
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-05-2026 | Judgment |
| 13-05-2026 | Judgment |
| 12-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 08-05-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Datta & Ors (SC Case No. 85/2023) Court Decision The Sessions Court, Latur acquitted all three accused—Datta Baburao Aade, Balaji Rama Chavan, and Anita Balaji Chavan—of charges under IPC Sections 307, 324, 504, and 506 (read with Section 34). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as key eyewitnesses (including the injured complainant) did not support the prosecution narrative, the knife recovery lacked credibility due to the open and accessible location, and the medical evidence was inconclusive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Datta & Ors (SC Case No. 85/2023) Court Decision The Sessions Court, Latur acquitted all three accused—Datta Baburao Aade, Balaji Rama Chavan, and Anita Balaji Chavan—of charges under IPC Sections 307, 324, 504, and 506 (read with Section 34). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as key eyewitnesses (including the injured complainant) did not support the prosecution narrative, the knife recovery lacked credibility due to the open and accessible location, and the medical evidence was inconclusive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts