Regional Officer vs Pasha Turab Natthad Advocate - Shaikh Mujeeb M — 112/2025
Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 18th April 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHLA010027192025
e-Filing Number
20-06-2025
Filing Number
2030/2025
Filing Date
21-Jun-2025
Registration No
112/2025
Registration Date
23-Jun-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court , Latur
Judge
5-Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Regional Officer
Adv. Kadam Baburao G
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pasha Turab Natthad Advocate - Shaikh Mujeeb M
-
2.District Collector
-
3.Deputy Superintendent
-
4.Mujib Mainoddin Natthad
Adv. Shaikh Mujeeb M
-
5.Mubin Mainoddin Natthad
Adv. Shaikh Mujeeb M
-
6.Matin Turbali Natthad
Adv. Shaikh Mujeeb M
-
7.Salima Hanan Shaikh
Adv. Shaikh Mujeeb M
-
8.Shenaj Yunus Shaikh
Adv. Shaikh Mujeeb M
-
9.Jakiya Chandpasha Shikh
Adv. Shaikh Mujeeb M
-
10.Dinkar Karna Kathare
-
11.Arefa Wahid Kureshi
-
12.Umren Wahid Kureshi U/g Arefa Wahid Kureshi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case 112/2025 Summary The court allowed the Regional Officer's application to condone a 25-day delay in filing an appeal against the decision in Civil Suit No. 319/2023 (decided 23/04/2025). The judge found the delay adequately explained: the original suit was transferred to a new court where the applicant didn't receive notice, resulting in an unfavorable judgment. After learning of the decision on 12/06/2025 and accounting for summer court closure and official formalities, the actual delay was only 1-2 days. The court permitted the appeal to proceed upon payment of Rs. 500 costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur
-
09-Apr-2026
Order
Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur
-
27-Mar-2026
Order
Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur
-
13-Mar-2026
Order
Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur
-
04-Mar-2026
Order
Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur
-
10-Feb-2026
Hearing
Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur
-
29-Jan-2026
Hearing
Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur
-
17-Dec-2025
Hearing
Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur
-
12-Dec-2025
Hearing
Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur
-
08-Dec-2025
Judgment
Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur
-
05-Nov-2025
Evidence
Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur
-
04-Oct-2025
Evidence
Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur
-
16-Sep-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence
Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur
-
02-Sep-2025
W.S. and Say
Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur
-
05-Aug-2025
W.S. and Say
District Judge -3 Latur
-
21-Jul-2025
W.S. and Say
District Judge -3 Latur
-
07-Jul-2025
W.S. and Say
District Judge -3 Latur
-
26-Jun-2025
W.S. and Say
District Judge -3 Latur
-
23-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 112/2025
Case 112/2025 Summary The court allowed the Regional Officer's application to condone a 25-day delay in filing an appeal against the decision in Civil Suit No. 319/2023 (decided 23/04/2025). The judge found the delay adequately explained: the original suit was transferred to a new court where the applicant didn't receive notice, resulting in an unfavorable judgment. After learning of the decision on 12/06/2025 and accounting for summer court closure and official formalities, the actual delay was only 1-2 days. The court permitted the appeal to proceed upon payment of Rs. 500 costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts