Rohini Dwarkanath Madrewar and 4 vs Bajirao Dagdu Todchire and — 157/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition
CNR: MHLA010023622022
Filing Number
1708/2022
Filing Date
05-07-2022
Registration No
157/2022
Registration Date
05-07-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court , Latur
Judge
5-Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rohini Dwarkanath Madrewar and 4
Adv. Khanapure Abhay B
Rachna Dwarkanath Madrewar
Adv. Khanapure Abhay B
Samarth Dwarkanath Madrewar
Adv. Khanapure Abhay B
Arjun Vitthal Madrewar
Adv. Khanapure Abhay B
Indubai Arjun Madrewar
Adv. Khanapure Abhay B
Respondent(s)
Bajirao Dagdu Todchire and
Kondiba Dagdu Tonchire
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.
Adv. Deshpande Kashinath G
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 21-01-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 157/2022 Summary The National Lok Adalat disposed of this motor accident compensation case through amicable settlement between the parties. The petitioners (Rohini Dwarkanath Madrewar and others) and respondents reached a settlement awarding compensation of Rs. 25,00,000 under sections 163X/166 of the M.V. Act, with specific amounts apportioned to each claimant. The award, deemed a civil court decree per the Legal Services Authorities Act 1987, requires the respondent to deposit compensation via NEFT transfer within the stipulated timeframe, with no deficit court fees payable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 157/2022 Summary The National Lok Adalat disposed of this motor accident compensation case through amicable settlement between the parties. The petitioners (Rohini Dwarkanath Madrewar and others) and respondents reached a settlement awarding compensation of Rs. 25,00,000 under sections 163X/166 of the M.V. Act, with specific amounts apportioned to each claimant. The award, deemed a civil court decree per the Legal Services Authorities Act 1987, requires the respondent to deposit compensation via NEFT transfer within the stipulated timeframe, with no deficit court fees payable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts