Babita Namdev Sitape and 3 vs Amarsinh alias Balasaheb Uttamrao Patil and 1 Advocate - Patel Hasham Ismail — 150/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition
CNR: MHLA010023242022
Filing Number
1675/2022
Filing Date
04-Jul-2022
Registration No
150/2022
Registration Date
04-Jul-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court , Latur
Judge
4-Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Babita Namdev Sitape and 3
Adv. Patil Abhay B_LAPA
-
2.Ankita Namdev Sitape
Adv. Patil Abhay B_LAPA
-
3.Soham Namdev Sitape
Adv. Patil Abhay B_LAPA
-
4.Nivrutti Masa Sitape
Adv. Patil Abhay B_LAPA11
Respondent(s)
-
1.Amarsinh alias Balasaheb Uttamrao Patil and 1 Advocate - Patel Hasham Ismail
-
2.Bharat Janardhan Ingale
Adv. Ingole Yuvraj Y
Case History
-
11-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-Apr-2026
Arguments
Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur
-
13-Mar-2026
Defence Evidence
Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur
-
24-Feb-2026
Defence Evidence
Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur
-
02-Feb-2026
Defence Evidence
Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur
-
22-Jan-2026
Defence Evidence
Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur
-
16-Dec-2025
Defence Evidence
Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur
-
14-Nov-2025
Defence Evidence
Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur
-
10-Oct-2025
Defence Evidence
Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur
-
15-Sep-2025
Defence Evidence
District Judge 2nd Latur
-
26-Aug-2025
Defence Evidence
District Judge 2nd Latur
-
07-Jul-2025
Defence Evidence
District Judge 2nd Latur
-
10-May-2025
Defence Evidence
District Judge -3 Latur
-
03-May-2025
Defence Evidence
District Judge -3 Latur
-
03-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge -3 Latur
-
20-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge -3 Latur
-
11-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge -3 Latur
-
15-Feb-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge -3 Latur
-
30-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge -3 Latur
-
04-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge -3 Latur
-
09-Dec-2024
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge -3 Latur
-
11-Nov-2024
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge -3 Latur
-
16-Oct-2024
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge -3 Latur
-
27-Sep-2024
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge -3 Latur
-
05-Sep-2024
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge -3 Latur
-
02-Aug-2024
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge -3 Latur
-
29-Jun-2024
List of Witness
District Judge -3 Latur
-
03-May-2024
Issues
District Judge -3 Latur
-
04-Apr-2024
Issues
District Judge -3 Latur
-
15-Feb-2024
Issues
District Judge -3 Latur
-
19-Dec-2023
Issues
District Judge -3 Latur
-
02-Nov-2023
Issues
District Judge -4 Latur
-
20-Sep-2023
Issues
District Judge -4 Latur
-
26-Jul-2023
Issues
District Judge -4 Latur
-
13-Jun-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
In MACP No. 150/2022, the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT), Latur allowed Respondent No. 2's (vehicle owner) application to set aside a previous W.S. order dated 13.6.2023. This was a death claim proceeding under the Motor Vehicle Act arising from a vehicular accident. No order as to costs was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Jun-2023
Issues
District Judge -4 Latur
-
17-Apr-2023
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
District Judge -4 Latur
-
18-Mar-2023
Written Statement
District Judge -4 Latur
-
16-Feb-2023
Written Statement
District Judge -4 Latur
-
16-Jan-2023
Written Statement
District Judge -4 Latur
-
22-Nov-2022
Notice_Unready
District Judge -4 Latur
-
14-Oct-2022
W.S. and Say
District Judge -4 Latur
-
14-Sep-2022
W.S. and Say
District Judge -4 Latur
-
05-Aug-2022
W.S. and Say
District Judge -4 Latur
-
04-Jul-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jul-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 150/2022
In MACP No. 150/2022, the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT), Latur allowed Respondent No. 2's (vehicle owner) application to set aside a previous W.S. order dated 13.6.2023. This was a death claim proceeding under the Motor Vehicle Act arising from a vehicular accident. No order as to costs was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts