Arbaj Afjal Shaikh vs State Of Maharashtra Advocate - District Govt. Pleader — 122/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 18th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHLA010007372026
e-Filing Number
13-03-2026
Filing Number
281/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
122/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Latur
Judge
2-District Judge 1st Latur
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
823
Police Station
Vivekanand Chowk Police Station, Latur
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arbaj Afjal Shaikh
Adv. Shaikh Afjal K
Respondent(s)
State Of Maharashtra Advocate - District Govt. Pleader
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Judge 1st Latur
Disposed
Order
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Order |
| 13-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 122/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge-1, Latur granted bail to Arbaj Afjal Shaikh in a case involving charges under BNS sections 109, 115(2), and 352 related to a group altercation. The court found that investigation was substantially complete with the chargesheet filed, the applicant had already been detained for 2.5 months, and three co-accused had been granted bail with different roles, justifying application of parity. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 30,000 PR bond with surety, restrictions on approaching witnesses, mandatory court attendance, and cooperation with investigation to address prosecution concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 122/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge-1, Latur granted bail to Arbaj Afjal Shaikh in a case involving charges under BNS sections 109, 115(2), and 352 related to a group altercation. The court found that investigation was substantially complete with the chargesheet filed, the applicant had already been detained for 2.5 months, and three co-accused had been granted bail with different roles, justifying application of parity. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 30,000 PR bond with surety, restrictions on approaching witnesses, mandatory court attendance, and cooperation with investigation to address prosecution concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts