Shoheb Noor Sayyed vs Adinath Gunwantrao More and 2 Advocate - Kulkarni Yogesh V — 36/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 22-Jun-2026 this date has passed

M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition

CNR: MHLA010007362022

Filing Number

605/2022

Filing Date

21-Feb-2022

Registration No

36/2022

Registration Date

21-Feb-2022

Court

District and Sessions Court , Latur

Judge

5-Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shoheb Noor Sayyed

    Adv. Patel Nazir G

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Adinath Gunwantrao More and 2 Advocate - Kulkarni Yogesh V

  2. 2.Sham Vitthalrao Pawar

    Adv. Kulkarni Yogesh V

  3. 3.United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

    Adv. Shivpurkar Shashank s

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur

  8. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur

  9. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur

  10. 29-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur

  11. 11-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Latur

  12. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge -4 Latur

  13. 25-Jun-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

    Case Summary: 36/2022 Outcome: The petitioner Shoheb Noor Sayyed's examination-in-chief was completed and cross-examination was conducted by advocates for the respondents. The court accepted the written submission filed by the petitioner. No re-examination was sought. The case proceeded with witness testimony in a motor vehicle accident compensation matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge -4 Latur

  15. 19-Apr-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    District Judge -4 Latur

  16. 14-Feb-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    District Judge -4 Latur

  17. 06-Jan-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    District Judge -4 Latur

  18. 28-Nov-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    District Judge -4 Latur

  19. 24-Oct-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    District Judge -4 Latur

  20. 09-Oct-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    District Judge -4 Latur

  21. 28-Aug-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    District Judge -4 Latur

  22. 19-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge -4 Latur

  23. 22-Jun-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge -4 Latur

  24. 10-May-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge -4 Latur

  25. 06-Apr-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge -4 Latur

  26. 14-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge -4 Latur

  27. 15-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge -4 Latur

  28. 31-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge -4 Latur

  29. 04-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge -4 Latur

  30. 13-Dec-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge -4 Latur

  31. 28-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    District Judge-5, Latur

  32. 31-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    District Judge-5, Latur

  33. 11-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    District Judge-5, Latur

  34. 29-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    District Judge-5, Latur

  35. 07-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    District Judge-5, Latur

  36. 19-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    District Judge-5, Latur

  37. 20-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    District Judge-5, Latur

  38. 27-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    District Judge-5, Latur

  39. 14-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    District Judge-5, Latur

  40. 13-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    District Judge-5, Latur

  41. 30-May-2023

    Evidence

    District Judge-5, Latur

  42. 03-May-2023

    Issues

    District Judge-5, Latur

  43. 17-Apr-2023

    Issues

    District Judge-5, Latur

  44. 21-Mar-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  45. 21-Mar-2023

    Issues

    District Judge-5, Latur

  46. 13-Mar-2023

    Order

    District Judge-5, Latur

  47. 13-Feb-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge-5, Latur

  48. 27-Jan-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge-5, Latur

  49. 25-Jan-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge-5, Latur

  50. 12-Jan-2023

    Order on Exh

    District Judge-5, Latur

  51. 10-Jan-2023

    Order on Exh

    District Judge-5, Latur

  52. 06-Jan-2023

    Order on Exh

    District Judge-5, Latur

  53. 22-Dec-2022

    Order on Exh

    District Judge-5, Latur

  54. 14-Dec-2022

    Order on Exh

    District Judge-5, Latur

  55. 01-Dec-2022

    Nfl Hearing

    District Judge-5, Latur

  56. 11-Nov-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge-5, Latur

  57. 13-Oct-2022

    Steps

    District Judge-5, Latur

  58. 12-Sep-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge-5, Latur

  59. 12-Aug-2022

    Written Statement

    District Judge-5, Latur

  60. 25-Jul-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge-5, Latur

  61. 16-Jun-2022

    Written Statement

    District Judge-5, Latur

  62. 01-Apr-2022

    Written Statement

    District Judge 1st Latur

  63. 12-Mar-2022

    Notice_Unready

    District Judge 1st Latur

  64. 21-Feb-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  65. 21-Feb-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 36/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 36/2022 Outcome: The petitioner Shoheb Noor Sayyed's examination-in-chief was completed and cross-examination was conducted by advocates for the respondents. The court accepted the written submission filed by the petitioner. No re-examination was sought. The case proceeded with witness testimony in a motor vehicle accident compensation matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case