Suryakant Gunderao Chavan vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - District Govt. Pleader — 121/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHLA010007352026

e-Filing Number

13-03-2026

Filing Number

280/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

121/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court , Latur

Judge

3-District Judge 2nd Latur

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

71

Police Station

Renapur Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Prevention of Corruption Act Section 7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suryakant Gunderao Chavan

    Adv. Desai Sunil V

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Advocate - District Govt. Pleader

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 121/2026 Summary: The court granted bail to Suryakant Gunderao Chavan, arrested under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The court found that the offense carries maximum 7 years imprisonment (not life sentence), the applicant had no criminal antecedents, investigation was largely complete, and prolonged detention was unjustified. He was released on a PR bond of Rs. 25,000 with conditions including non-contact with witnesses and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge 2nd Latur

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 121/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 121/2026 Summary: The court granted bail to Suryakant Gunderao Chavan, arrested under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The court found that the offense carries maximum 7 years imprisonment (not life sentence), the applicant had no criminal antecedents, investigation was largely complete, and prolonged detention was unjustified. He was released on a PR bond of Rs. 25,000 with conditions including non-contact with witnesses and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case