Pravin Mahadeo Sitape vs Balaji Gopinath Magar And Other — 9/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21,11. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
MACP. Dkst. - Execution of Award in Motor Accident Claims
CNR: MHLA010007332026
e-Filing Number
13-03-2026
Filing Number
483/2026
Filing Date
13-Mar-2026
Registration No
9/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Latur
Judge
2-District Judge 1st Latur
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pravin Mahadeo Sitape
Adv. Kedar Parbat R
Respondent(s)
-
1.Balaji Gopinath Magar And Other
-
2.Mangesh Dilip Patil
-
3.Jaidrath Tulsiram Mahapure
-
4.Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Ltd. Through Branch Manager
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The National Lok-Adalat at Latur settled the Motor Vehicles Act compensation claim of Pravin Mahadeo Sitape through amicable settlement. Respondent Cholamandlam MS General Insurance Company was ordered to pay Rs. 58,00,000/- (Fifty Eight Lakh Rupees) as full and final compensation within 45 days, inclusive of No Fault Liability, costs, and interest, with 6.5% interest payable if payment is delayed, and the claimant waived all other claims against remaining respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge 1st Latur
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 9/2026
The National Lok-Adalat at Latur settled the Motor Vehicles Act compensation claim of Pravin Mahadeo Sitape through amicable settlement. Respondent Cholamandlam MS General Insurance Company was ordered to pay Rs. 58,00,000/- (Fifty Eight Lakh Rupees) as full and final compensation within 45 days, inclusive of No Fault Liability, costs, and interest, with 6.5% interest payable if payment is delayed, and the claimant waived all other claims against remaining respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts