Omprasad Alias Ravi Pradip Kasbe vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - District Govt. Pleader — 117/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHLA010007142026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
272/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
117/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Latur
Judge
3-District Judge 2nd Latur
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
94
Police Station
Shivaji Nagar Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Omprasad Alias Ravi Pradip Kasbe
Adv. Muchate Suresh M
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Advocate - District Govt. Pleader
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court granted bail to Omprasad Alias Ravi Pradip Kasbe, who was arrested for alleged assault with a chopper and robbery of Rs. 8,000. The court found no prima facie evidence supporting the FIR allegations—specifically, no weapon or cash was recovered from the applicant's possession and the informant sustained no injuries—creating doubt about the charges. Though the applicant had eight prior FIRs registered, he was not a previous convict and being a local resident ready to abide by conditions, the court allowed bail on Rs. 25,000 personal recognizance bond with sureties and standard conditions prohibiting witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge 2nd Latur
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 117/2026
The court granted bail to Omprasad Alias Ravi Pradip Kasbe, who was arrested for alleged assault with a chopper and robbery of Rs. 8,000. The court found no prima facie evidence supporting the FIR allegations—specifically, no weapon or cash was recovered from the applicant's possession and the informant sustained no injuries—creating doubt about the charges. Though the applicant had eight prior FIRs registered, he was not a previous convict and being a local resident ready to abide by conditions, the court allowed bail on Rs. 25,000 personal recognizance bond with sureties and standard conditions prohibiting witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts