Omprasad Alias Ravi Pradip Kasbe vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - District Govt. Pleader — 117/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHLA010007142026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
272/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
117/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Latur
Judge
3-District Judge 2nd Latur
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
94
Police Station
Shivaji Nagar Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Omprasad Alias Ravi Pradip Kasbe
Adv. Muchate Suresh M
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Advocate - District Govt. Pleader
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge 2nd Latur
Disposed
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted bail to Omprasad Alias Ravi Pradip Kasbe, who was arrested for alleged assault with a chopper and robbery of Rs. 8,000. The court found no prima facie evidence supporting the FIR allegations—specifically, no weapon or cash was recovered from the applicant's possession and the informant sustained no injuries—creating doubt about the charges. Though the applicant had eight prior FIRs registered, he was not a previous convict and being a local resident ready to abide by conditions, the court allowed bail on Rs. 25,000 personal recognizance bond with sureties and standard conditions prohibiting witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted bail to Omprasad Alias Ravi Pradip Kasbe, who was arrested for alleged assault with a chopper and robbery of Rs. 8,000. The court found no prima facie evidence supporting the FIR allegations—specifically, no weapon or cash was recovered from the applicant's possession and the informant sustained no injuries—creating doubt about the charges. Though the applicant had eight prior FIRs registered, he was not a previous convict and being a local resident ready to abide by conditions, the court allowed bail on Rs. 25,000 personal recognizance bond with sureties and standard conditions prohibiting witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts