Imran Musa Alias Isak Pathan vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - District Govt. Pleader — 113/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHLA010007072026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
268/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
113/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Latur
Judge
2-District Judge 1st Latur
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
145
Police Station
Vivekanand Chowk Police Station, Latur
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Imran Musa Alias Isak Pathan
Adv. Bhise Pratapsingh Balaji
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Advocate - District Govt. Pleader
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Judge 1st Latur
Disposed
Order
Arguments
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Order |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 113/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge-1, Latur granted bail to Imran Musa @ Isak Pathan in a gutkha (prohibited contraband) possession case. The court found that while gutkha worth Rs. 69,485 was recovered from the applicant's house on 23.12.2025, the prosecution failed to establish the applicant's direct possession at that stage, making the Section 123 BNS charge doubtful. Relying on apex court precedent (Eknath Patil vs. State of Maharashtra), the judge ruled that conditional bail could adequately address prosecution concerns about witness interference. The applicant was released on a PR bond of Rs. 30,000 with sureties and directed to attend court hearings regularly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 113/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge-1, Latur granted bail to Imran Musa @ Isak Pathan in a gutkha (prohibited contraband) possession case. The court found that while gutkha worth Rs. 69,485 was recovered from the applicant's house on 23.12.2025, the prosecution failed to establish the applicant's direct possession at that stage, making the Section 123 BNS charge doubtful. Relying on apex court precedent (Eknath Patil vs. State of Maharashtra), the judge ruled that conditional bail could adequately address prosecution concerns about witness interference. The applicant was released on a PR bond of Rs. 30,000 with sureties and directed to attend court hearings regularly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts