Aniket Pradip Raut vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - District Govt. Pleader — 100/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHLA010006572026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
248/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
100/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Latur
Judge
3-District Judge 2nd Latur
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
94
Police Station
Shivaji Nagar Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Aniket Pradip Raut
Adv. Muchate Nilesh S
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Advocate - District Govt. Pleader
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge 2nd Latur
Disposed
Arguments
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 05-03-2026 | Compliance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Bail Application No. 100/2026 Decision: The court granted bail to Aniket Pradip Raut on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 25,000 with one or two sureties in the like amount. Key Reasoning: Although the charges are serious (assault, criminal intimidation, Arms Act violations), the court found that the FIR shows only unarmed physical assault (kicks and fists), with no weapon recovery or other aggravating factors. The applicant is a student with no criminal history, is a local resident not required for further investigation, and is willing to comply with bail conditions, making detention unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Criminal Bail Application No. 100/2026 Decision: The court granted bail to Aniket Pradip Raut on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 25,000 with one or two sureties in the like amount. Key Reasoning: Although the charges are serious (assault, criminal intimidation, Arms Act violations), the court found that the FIR shows only unarmed physical assault (kicks and fists), with no weapon recovery or other aggravating factors. The applicant is a student with no criminal history, is a local resident not required for further investigation, and is willing to comply with bail conditions, making detention unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts