Nasimabegum Israruddin Kazi And other 4 vs Akhtarbegum Sabdar Sayyed And Other — 13/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 41. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal
CNR: MHLA010005762026
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
e-Filing Number
20-02-2026
Filing Number
391/2026
Filing Date
20-02-2026
Registration No
13/2026
Registration Date
21-02-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Latur
Judge
4-Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.S.J., Latur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nasimabegum Israruddin Kazi And other 4
Adv. Mane Arvind D
Aheteshamoddin Israruddin Kazi
Adv. Mane Arvind D
Tamizoddin Israruddin Kazi
Adv. Mane Arvind D
Ajijoddin Israruddin Kazi
Adv. Mane Arvind D
Nizamoddin alias Nisaruddin Aheteshamuddin Kazi
Adv. Mane Arvind D
Raisoddin Khaliloddin Kazi
Adv. Mane Arvind D
Respondent(s)
Akhtarbegum Sabdar Sayyed And Other
Khijarali Sabdarali Sayyed
Zuberali Sabdarali Sayyed
Azharali Sabdarali Sayyed
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.S.J., Latur
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 15-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 08-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-05-2026 | Notice_Unready |
| 20-04-2026 | Notice_Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: M.C.A. No. 13/2026 Outcome: Interim stay granted. The court granted an interim stay on the heirship certificate (issued 14.11.2024) recognizing respondents as heirs of Kundanbee, but restricted it solely to property survey No. 44/1 at Latur. The appellants, who have possessed the property for 70 years, challenged the certificate claiming Kundanbee died issueless. The court found the respondents' primary purpose was recording names in survey No. 44/1 using the certificate and decided that recording names would create complications pending the respondents' separate suit for ownership declaration. The stay remains effective until appeal disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: M.C.A. No. 13/2026 Outcome: Interim stay granted. The court granted an interim stay on the heirship certificate (issued 14.11.2024) recognizing respondents as heirs of Kundanbee, but restricted it solely to property survey No. 44/1 at Latur. The appellants, who have possessed the property for 70 years, challenged the certificate claiming Kundanbee died issueless. The court found the respondents' primary purpose was recording names in survey No. 44/1 using the certificate and decided that recording names would create complications pending the respondents' separate suit for ownership declaration. The stay remains effective until appeal disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts