Nasimabegum Israruddin Kazi And other 4 vs Akhtarbegum Sabdar Sayyed And Other — 13/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 41. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal

CNR: MHLA010005762026

Arguments

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

e-Filing Number

20-02-2026

Filing Number

391/2026

Filing Date

20-02-2026

Registration No

13/2026

Registration Date

21-02-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court , Latur

Judge

4-Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.S.J., Latur

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 41

Petitioner(s)

Nasimabegum Israruddin Kazi And other 4

Adv. Mane Arvind D

Aheteshamoddin Israruddin Kazi

Adv. Mane Arvind D

Tamizoddin Israruddin Kazi

Adv. Mane Arvind D

Ajijoddin Israruddin Kazi

Adv. Mane Arvind D

Nizamoddin alias Nisaruddin Aheteshamuddin Kazi

Adv. Mane Arvind D

Raisoddin Khaliloddin Kazi

Adv. Mane Arvind D

Respondent(s)

Akhtarbegum Sabdar Sayyed And Other

Khijarali Sabdarali Sayyed

Zuberali Sabdarali Sayyed

Azharali Sabdarali Sayyed

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.S.J., Latur

16-05-2026

Arguments

15-05-2026

Arguments

08-05-2026

Arguments

04-05-2026

Notice_Unready

20-04-2026

Notice_Unready

Interim Orders

16-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: M.C.A. No. 13/2026 Outcome: Interim stay granted. The court granted an interim stay on the heirship certificate (issued 14.11.2024) recognizing respondents as heirs of Kundanbee, but restricted it solely to property survey No. 44/1 at Latur. The appellants, who have possessed the property for 70 years, challenged the certificate claiming Kundanbee died issueless. The court found the respondents' primary purpose was recording names in survey No. 44/1 using the certificate and decided that recording names would create complications pending the respondents' separate suit for ownership declaration. The stay remains effective until appeal disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: M.C.A. No. 13/2026 Outcome: Interim stay granted. The court granted an interim stay on the heirship certificate (issued 14.11.2024) recognizing respondents as heirs of Kundanbee, but restricted it solely to property survey No. 44/1 at Latur. The appellants, who have possessed the property for 70 years, challenged the certificate claiming Kundanbee died issueless. The court found the respondents' primary purpose was recording names in survey No. 44/1 using the certificate and decided that recording names would create complications pending the respondents' separate suit for ownership declaration. The stay remains effective until appeal disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Latur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case