Nasimabegum Israruddin Kazi And other 4 vs Akhtarbegum Sabdar Sayyed And Other — 13/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 41. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 11-Jun-2026 this date has passed

M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal

CNR: MHLA010005762026

e-Filing Number

20-02-2026

Filing Number

391/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

13/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court , Latur

Judge

4-Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 41

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nasimabegum Israruddin Kazi And other 4

    Adv. Mane Arvind D

  2. 2.Aheteshamoddin Israruddin Kazi

    Adv. Mane Arvind D

  3. 3.Tamizoddin Israruddin Kazi

    Adv. Mane Arvind D

  4. 4.Ajijoddin Israruddin Kazi

    Adv. Mane Arvind D

  5. 5.Nizamoddin alias Nisaruddin Aheteshamuddin Kazi

    Adv. Mane Arvind D

  6. 6.Raisoddin Khaliloddin Kazi

    Adv. Mane Arvind D

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Akhtarbegum Sabdar Sayyed And Other

  2. 2.Khijarali Sabdarali Sayyed

  3. 3.Zuberali Sabdarali Sayyed

  4. 4.Azharali Sabdarali Sayyed

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: M.C.A. No. 13/2026 Outcome: Interim stay granted. The court granted an interim stay on the heirship certificate (issued 14.11.2024) recognizing respondents as heirs of Kundanbee, but restricted it solely to property survey No. 44/1 at Latur. The appellants, who have possessed the property for 70 years, challenged the certificate claiming Kundanbee died issueless. The court found the respondents' primary purpose was recording names in survey No. 44/1 using the certificate and decided that recording names would create complications pending the respondents' separate suit for ownership declaration. The stay remains effective until appeal disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-May-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur

  4. 15-May-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur

  5. 08-May-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur

  6. 04-May-2026

    Notice_Unready

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur

  7. 20-Apr-2026

    Notice_Unready

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.s.j., Latur

  9. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 13/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: M.C.A. No. 13/2026 Outcome: Interim stay granted. The court granted an interim stay on the heirship certificate (issued 14.11.2024) recognizing respondents as heirs of Kundanbee, but restricted it solely to property survey No. 44/1 at Latur. The appellants, who have possessed the property for 70 years, challenged the certificate claiming Kundanbee died issueless. The court found the respondents' primary purpose was recording names in survey No. 44/1 using the certificate and decided that recording names would create complications pending the respondents' separate suit for ownership declaration. The stay remains effective until appeal disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case