State of Maharashtra vs Pandit Kundlik Pawar UTP Advocate - LADC Tiwari Ameet Jagdish — 26/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,238. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 11-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Sessions Case

CNR: MHLA010003752025

Filing Number

157/2025

Filing Date

05-Feb-2025

Registration No

26/2025

Registration Date

05-Feb-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court , Latur

Judge

2-District Judge 1st Latur

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

721

Police Station

MIDC, Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,238

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. Kulkarni Meera R_DGP6

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pandit Kundlik Pawar UTP Advocate - LADC Tiwari Ameet Jagdish

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 26-May-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 1st Latur

  3. 08-May-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 1st Latur

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 1st Latur

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 1st Latur

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 1st Latur

  7. 27-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 1st Latur

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 1st Latur

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 1st Latur

  10. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 1st Latur

  11. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 1st Latur

  12. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 1st Latur

  13. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 1st Latur

  14. 22-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 1st Latur

  15. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 1st Latur

  16. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 1st Latur

  17. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 1st Latur

  18. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 1st Latur

  19. 29-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 1st Latur

  20. 15-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 1st Latur

  21. 29-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 1st Latur

  22. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 1st Latur

  23. 30-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 1st Latur

  24. 19-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 1st Latur

  25. 08-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 1st Latur

  26. 02-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    District Judge 1st Latur

  27. 17-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    District Judge 1st Latur

  28. 03-Jun-2025

    Admission and Denial

    District Judge 1st Latur

  29. 20-May-2025

    Admission and Denial

    District Judge 1st Latur

  30. 05-May-2025

    Admission and Denial

    District Judge 1st Latur

  31. 22-Apr-2025

    Admission and Denial

    District Judge 1st Latur

  32. 07-Apr-2025

    Admission and Denial

    District Judge 1st Latur

  33. 24-Mar-2025

    Admission and Denial

    District Judge 1st Latur

  34. 10-Mar-2025

    Admission and Denial

    District Judge 1st Latur

  35. 05-Mar-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Pandit Kundlik Pawar (S.C. No. 26/2025) Bail application of Pandit Kundlik Pawar, accused of murder under Sections 103 and 238 of BNS 2023, was rejected. The court found prima facie evidence against the accused in the form of CCTV footage placing him at the crime scene (Hotel Yashraj Idli Center on 27.10.2024 at 3:25-3:34 hours) and recovery of the deceased's mobile phone per his disclosure statement. Given the serious nature of the offense—brutal murder by stone attack and subsequent burning of the body to destroy evidence—the court determined that granting bail posed risks of abscondence, witness tampering, and further offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  36. 05-Mar-2025

    Charge

    District Judge 1st Latur

  37. 03-Mar-2025

    Charge

    District Judge 1st Latur

  38. 28-Feb-2025

    Charge

    District Judge 1st Latur

  39. 24-Feb-2025

    Charge

    District Judge 1st Latur

  40. 20-Feb-2025

    Charge

    District Judge 1st Latur

  41. 17-Feb-2025

    Charge

    District Judge 1st Latur

  42. 13-Feb-2025

    Charge

    District Judge 1st Latur

  43. 10-Feb-2025

    Charge

    District Judge 1st Latur

  44. 05-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 05-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 26/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Pandit Kundlik Pawar (S.C. No. 26/2025) Bail application of Pandit Kundlik Pawar, accused of murder under Sections 103 and 238 of BNS 2023, was rejected. The court found prima facie evidence against the accused in the form of CCTV footage placing him at the crime scene (Hotel Yashraj Idli Center on 27.10.2024 at 3:25-3:34 hours) and recovery of the deceased's mobile phone per his disclosure statement. Given the serious nature of the offense—brutal murder by stone attack and subsequent burning of the body to destroy evidence—the court determined that granting bail posed risks of abscondence, witness tampering, and further offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case