State of Maharashtra vs Pandit Kundlik Pawar UTP Advocate - LADC Tiwari Ameet Jagdish — 26/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,238. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: MHLA010003752025

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

157/2025

Filing Date

05-02-2025

Registration No

26/2025

Registration Date

05-02-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court , Latur

Judge

2-District Judge 1st Latur

FIR Details

FIR Number

721

Police Station

MIDC, Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,238

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. Kulkarni Meera R_DGP6

Respondent(s)

Pandit Kundlik Pawar UTP Advocate - LADC Tiwari Ameet Jagdish

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Judge 1st Latur

26-05-2026

Evidence Part Heard

08-05-2026

Evidence Part Heard

28-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

16-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

10-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

05-03-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Pandit Kundlik Pawar (S.C. No. 26/2025) Bail application of Pandit Kundlik Pawar, accused of murder under Sections 103 and 238 of BNS 2023, was rejected. The court found prima facie evidence against the accused in the form of CCTV footage placing him at the crime scene (Hotel Yashraj Idli Center on 27.10.2024 at 3:25-3:34 hours) and recovery of the deceased's mobile phone per his disclosure statement. Given the serious nature of the offense—brutal murder by stone attack and subsequent burning of the body to destroy evidence—the court determined that granting bail posed risks of abscondence, witness tampering, and further offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Pandit Kundlik Pawar (S.C. No. 26/2025) Bail application of Pandit Kundlik Pawar, accused of murder under Sections 103 and 238 of BNS 2023, was rejected. The court found prima facie evidence against the accused in the form of CCTV footage placing him at the crime scene (Hotel Yashraj Idli Center on 27.10.2024 at 3:25-3:34 hours) and recovery of the deceased's mobile phone per his disclosure statement. Given the serious nature of the offense—brutal murder by stone attack and subsequent burning of the body to destroy evidence—the court determined that granting bail posed risks of abscondence, witness tampering, and further offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Latur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case