State of Maharashtra vs Pandit Kundlik Pawar UTP Advocate - LADC Tiwari Ameet Jagdish — 26/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,238. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHLA010003752025
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
157/2025
Filing Date
05-02-2025
Registration No
26/2025
Registration Date
05-02-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court , Latur
Judge
2-District Judge 1st Latur
FIR Details
FIR Number
721
Police Station
MIDC, Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Kulkarni Meera R_DGP6
Respondent(s)
Pandit Kundlik Pawar UTP Advocate - LADC Tiwari Ameet Jagdish
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Judge 1st Latur
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 08-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 28-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Pandit Kundlik Pawar (S.C. No. 26/2025) Bail application of Pandit Kundlik Pawar, accused of murder under Sections 103 and 238 of BNS 2023, was rejected. The court found prima facie evidence against the accused in the form of CCTV footage placing him at the crime scene (Hotel Yashraj Idli Center on 27.10.2024 at 3:25-3:34 hours) and recovery of the deceased's mobile phone per his disclosure statement. Given the serious nature of the offense—brutal murder by stone attack and subsequent burning of the body to destroy evidence—the court determined that granting bail posed risks of abscondence, witness tampering, and further offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Pandit Kundlik Pawar (S.C. No. 26/2025) Bail application of Pandit Kundlik Pawar, accused of murder under Sections 103 and 238 of BNS 2023, was rejected. The court found prima facie evidence against the accused in the form of CCTV footage placing him at the crime scene (Hotel Yashraj Idli Center on 27.10.2024 at 3:25-3:34 hours) and recovery of the deceased's mobile phone per his disclosure statement. Given the serious nature of the offense—brutal murder by stone attack and subsequent burning of the body to destroy evidence—the court determined that granting bail posed risks of abscondence, witness tampering, and further offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts