Anita Gajanan Nagmode And Others 4 vs Layak Chansab Chand Chandpasha Shaikh (Fakir) And Another — 18/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 20th March 2026.
MACP. M.A. - Misc. Application in Motor Accident Claims
CNR: MHLA010003212026
e-Filing Number
27-01-2026
Filing Number
193/2026
Filing Date
29-01-2026
Registration No
18/2026
Registration Date
30-01-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Latur
Judge
5-Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anita Gajanan Nagmode And Others 4
Adv. Potdar Amol B
Shrawan Gajanan Nagmode U/G. Anita Gajanan Nagmode
Adv. Potdar Amol B
Sudhakar Baburao Nagmode
Adv. Potdar Amol B
Mangal Sudhakar Nagmode
Adv. Potdar Amol B
Sunita Sudhakar Nagmode
Adv. Potdar Amol B
Respondent(s)
Layak Chansab Chand Chandpasha Shaikh (Fakir) And Another
ICICI Lombard General Manager Regional Manger
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Adhoc Dist. Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Latur
Disposed
Order on Exh
Arguments
Report
First Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 20-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-02-2026 | Report |
| 09-02-2026 | First Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed the applicants' petition to release a Fixed Deposit Receipt (FDR No.0551176) containing Rs.3,00,000 that had been deposited for five years per the original motor accident compensation award (MACP No.46/2016). Finding that the FDR period had expired and the applicant needed the funds for daily necessities, the court directed the tribunal's Nazir to release the FDR upon the applicant's identification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed the applicants' petition to release a Fixed Deposit Receipt (FDR No.0551176) containing Rs.3,00,000 that had been deposited for five years per the original motor accident compensation award (MACP No.46/2016). Finding that the FDR period had expired and the applicant needed the funds for daily necessities, the court directed the tribunal's Nazir to release the FDR upon the applicant's identification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts