Parvatibai Govindrao Shingare (Mali) vs Vishwanath Shamrao Shingare (Mali) — 6/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 41. Status: Notice_Unready. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHLA010002452026
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
20-01-2026
Filing Number
156/2026
Filing Date
20-01-2026
Registration No
6/2026
Registration Date
21-01-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Latur
Judge
4-Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.S.J., Latur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Parvatibai Govindrao Shingare (Mali)
Adv. Patil Unmesh B
Respondent(s)
Vishwanath Shamrao Shingare (Mali)
Bibhishan Shamrao Shingare (Mali)
Shankar Kisan Shingare (Mali)
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.S.J., Latur
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Notice_Unready |
| 22-04-2026 | Notice_Unready |
| 09-04-2026 | Notice_Unready |
| 02-04-2026 | Notice_Unready |
| 13-03-2026 | Notice_Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.A. No. 06/2026 The court rejected the appellant's request for an ex-parte temporary injunction over suit property Gat No. 37. Since the trial court had already recorded a negative finding on the appellant's ownership and the respondents dispute the property being ancestral rather than owned through compromise, the court held that the respondents must be heard before granting any injunction. Notice was issued to respondents to show cause why the temporary injunction should not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.A. No. 06/2026 The court rejected the appellant's request for an ex-parte temporary injunction over suit property Gat No. 37. Since the trial court had already recorded a negative finding on the appellant's ownership and the respondents dispute the property being ancestral rather than owned through compromise, the court held that the respondents must be heard before granting any injunction. Notice was issued to respondents to show cause why the temporary injunction should not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts