Parvatibai Govindrao Shingare (Mali) vs Vishwanath Shamrao Shingare (Mali) — 6/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 41. Status: Notice_Unready. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal

CNR: MHLA010002452026

Notice_Unready

Next Hearing

09th June 2026

e-Filing Number

20-01-2026

Filing Number

156/2026

Filing Date

20-01-2026

Registration No

6/2026

Registration Date

21-01-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court , Latur

Judge

4-Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.S.J., Latur

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 41

Petitioner(s)

Parvatibai Govindrao Shingare (Mali)

Adv. Patil Unmesh B

Respondent(s)

Vishwanath Shamrao Shingare (Mali)

Bibhishan Shamrao Shingare (Mali)

Shankar Kisan Shingare (Mali)

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Adhoc Dist. Judge - 1 and A.S.J., Latur

06-05-2026

Notice_Unready

22-04-2026

Notice_Unready

09-04-2026

Notice_Unready

02-04-2026

Notice_Unready

13-03-2026

Notice_Unready

Interim Orders

14-02-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: R.C.A. No. 06/2026 The court rejected the appellant's request for an ex-parte temporary injunction over suit property Gat No. 37. Since the trial court had already recorded a negative finding on the appellant's ownership and the respondents dispute the property being ancestral rather than owned through compromise, the court held that the respondents must be heard before granting any injunction. Notice was issued to respondents to show cause why the temporary injunction should not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.A. No. 06/2026 The court rejected the appellant's request for an ex-parte temporary injunction over suit property Gat No. 37. Since the trial court had already recorded a negative finding on the appellant's ownership and the respondents dispute the property being ancestral rather than owned through compromise, the court held that the respondents must be heard before granting any injunction. Notice was issued to respondents to show cause why the temporary injunction should not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Latur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case