State of Maharashtra vs Sanjay Ananda Katkar Advocate - Vikrant Shamrao Patil — 217/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO200004182024
Filing Number
318/2024
Filing Date
24-10-2024
Registration No
217/2024
Registration Date
24-10-2024
Court
CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
128
Police Station
Inspector, State Excise, Divisional Fine Sqad, Kolhapur
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Sanjay Ananda Katkar Advocate - Vikrant Shamrao Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Disposed
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 05-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 29-12-2025 | Hearing |
| 06-10-2025 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Sanjay Ananda Katkar (Case 217/2024) The court acquitted accused Sanjay Ananda Katkar of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act 1949, Section 65(E) for alleged illegal liquor sale. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, relying on testimony from only one investigating officer without corroborating evidence, no independent eyewitness, and unsubstantiated seizure documentation or laboratory reports. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Sanjay Ananda Katkar (Case 217/2024) The court acquitted accused Sanjay Ananda Katkar of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act 1949, Section 65(E) for alleged illegal liquor sale. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, relying on testimony from only one investigating officer without corroborating evidence, no independent eyewitness, and unsubstantiated seizure documentation or laboratory reports. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts