State of Maharashtra vs Babaji Namdeo Bhosale Advocate - Mohanrao S. Bhosale — 178/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO200003722018
Filing Number
265/2018
Filing Date
14-12-2018
Registration No
178/2018
Registration Date
14-12-2018
Court
CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
98
Police Station
Panhala Police Station
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Babaji Namdeo Bhosale Advocate - Mohanrao S. Bhosale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 02-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
CASE SUMMARY In this criminal case (178/2018), the State of Maharashtra charged Babaji Namdeo Bhosale with rash/negligent driving causing grievous injury under IPC Sections 279, 338 and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 184, 134(1)(b). The accused allegedly hit a bicycle with his tractor on May 21, 2018, seriously injuring a child. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to weak eyewitness testimony from biased sources (complainant's relatives/friends) and absence of independent witnesses, ultimately acquitting the accused on May 6, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY In this criminal case (178/2018), the State of Maharashtra charged Babaji Namdeo Bhosale with rash/negligent driving causing grievous injury under IPC Sections 279, 338 and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 184, 134(1)(b). The accused allegedly hit a bicycle with his tractor on May 21, 2018, seriously injuring a child. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to weak eyewitness testimony from biased sources (complainant's relatives/friends) and absence of independent witnesses, ultimately acquitting the accused on May 6, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts