State of Maharashtra vs Ananda Lakhu Kumbhar Advocate - Vikrant Shamrao Patil — 41/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,148,149,325,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 14th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO200003572018
Filing Number
254/2018
Filing Date
04-12-2018
Registration No
41/2018
Registration Date
04-12-2018
Court
CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Decision Date
14th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
30
Police Station
Kale Police Station, Kale
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Ananda Lakhu Kumbhar Advocate - Vikrant Shamrao Patil
Shalabai Ananda Kumbhar
Jotiram Ananda Kumbhar
Kanchan Jotiram Kumbhar
Shrikant Maruti Kumbhar
Akshay Yuvraj Pandav
Aaditya Yuvraj Pandav
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Ananda Lakhu Kumbhar & Others (Case 41/2018) Court Decision: All seven accused were acquitted and discharged under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) sections 143, 147, 148, 325, 324, 504, 506, and 149. Key Facts: On April 30, 2018, a violent confrontation occurred in Valvekarwadi village involving the accused and complainants over a disputed land plot (no. 289). The prosecution alleged a rioting incident with injuries inflicted using wooden sticks. Key Reasoning: The court found insufficient credible evidence to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Witness testimonies revealed multiple inconsistencies—witnesses acknowledged property disputes existed between parties, some testified they didn't directly witness certain acts, and evidence suggested personal animosities rather than organized unlawful assembly. The prosecution failed to prove the common intention and assembly required for rioting charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Ananda Lakhu Kumbhar & Others (Case 41/2018) Court Decision: All seven accused were acquitted and discharged under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) sections 143, 147, 148, 325, 324, 504, 506, and 149. Key Facts: On April 30, 2018, a violent confrontation occurred in Valvekarwadi village involving the accused and complainants over a disputed land plot (no. 289). The prosecution alleged a rioting incident with injuries inflicted using wooden sticks. Key Reasoning: The court found insufficient credible evidence to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Witness testimonies revealed multiple inconsistencies—witnesses acknowledged property disputes existed between parties, some testified they didn't directly witness certain acts, and evidence suggested personal animosities rather than organized unlawful assembly. The prosecution failed to prove the common intention and assembly required for rioting charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts