State of Maharashtra vs Ananda Lakhu Kumbhar Advocate - Vikrant Shamrao Patil — 41/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,148,149,325,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 14th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO200003572018
Filing Number
254/2018
Filing Date
04-Dec-2018
Registration No
41/2018
Registration Date
04-Dec-2018
Court
CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade
Judge
1-Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
30
Police Station
Kale Police Station, Kale
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ananda Lakhu Kumbhar Advocate - Vikrant Shamrao Patil
-
2.Shalabai Ananda Kumbhar
-
3.Jotiram Ananda Kumbhar
-
4.Kanchan Jotiram Kumbhar
-
5.Shrikant Maruti Kumbhar
-
6.Akshay Yuvraj Pandav
-
7.Aaditya Yuvraj Pandav
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Ananda Lakhu Kumbhar & Others (Case 41/2018) Court Decision: All seven accused were acquitted and discharged under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) sections 143, 147, 148, 325, 324, 504, 506, and 149. Key Facts: On April 30, 2018, a violent confrontation occurred in Valvekarwadi village involving the accused and complainants over a disputed land plot (no. 289). The prosecution alleged a rioting incident with injuries inflicted using wooden sticks. Key Reasoning: The court found insufficient credible evidence to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Witness testimonies revealed multiple inconsistencies—witnesses acknowledged property disputes existed between parties, some testified they didn't directly witness certain acts, and evidence suggested personal animosities rather than organized unlawful assembly. The prosecution failed to prove the common intention and assembly required for rioting charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-May-2026
Disposed
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
20-Apr-2026
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
30-Mar-2026
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
16-Mar-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
12-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
14-Aug-2025
Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
10-Jul-2025
Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
05-Jun-2025
Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
15-Apr-2025
Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
24-Mar-2025
Hearing
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
15-Feb-2025
Hearing
-
12-Dec-2024
Hearing
-
04-Nov-2024
Hearing
-
09-Sep-2024
Hearing
-
05-Aug-2024
Hearing
-
06-Jul-2024
Hearing
-
03-Jun-2024
Hearing
-
06-May-2024
Hearing
-
18-Mar-2024
Hearing
-
30-Jan-2024
Hearing
-
26-Dec-2023
Hearing
-
17-Oct-2023
Hearing
-
18-Sep-2023
Hearing
-
28-Aug-2023
Hearing
-
24-Jul-2023
Hearing
-
12-Jun-2023
Hearing
-
10-Apr-2023
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
13-Mar-2023
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
21-Jan-2023
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
12-Dec-2022
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
07-Nov-2022
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
19-Sep-2022
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
06-Aug-2022
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
23-Jun-2022
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
22-Mar-2022
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
05-Feb-2022
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
21-Dec-2021
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
11-Nov-2021
ChargeView PDF
-
11-Nov-2021
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
28-Sep-2021
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
23-Aug-2021
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
15-Jul-2021
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
27-Apr-2021
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
16-Mar-2021
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
15-Feb-2021
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
19-Jan-2021
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
24-Nov-2020
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
08-Sep-2020
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
19-Jun-2020
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
02-Jun-2020
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
14-May-2020
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
23-Apr-2020
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
07-Mar-2020
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
11-Feb-2020
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
13-Jan-2020
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
19-Dec-2019
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
23-Nov-2019
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
05-Nov-2019
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
26-Sep-2019
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
27-Aug-2019
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
18-Jul-2019
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
17-Jun-2019
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
15-Apr-2019
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
26-Mar-2019
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
14-Mar-2019
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
21-Feb-2019
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
11-Feb-2019
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
28-Jan-2019
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
04-Dec-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Dec-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 41/2018
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Ananda Lakhu Kumbhar & Others (Case 41/2018) Court Decision: All seven accused were acquitted and discharged under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) sections 143, 147, 148, 325, 324, 504, 506, and 149. Key Facts: On April 30, 2018, a violent confrontation occurred in Valvekarwadi village involving the accused and complainants over a disputed land plot (no. 289). The prosecution alleged a rioting incident with injuries inflicted using wooden sticks. Key Reasoning: The court found insufficient credible evidence to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Witness testimonies revealed multiple inconsistencies—witnesses acknowledged property disputes existed between parties, some testified they didn't directly witness certain acts, and evidence suggested personal animosities rather than organized unlawful assembly. The prosecution failed to prove the common intention and assembly required for rioting charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts