Ananda Mahadev Patil vs Sampatrao Sitaram Dinde Advocate - Prashant J. Patil — 65/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO200003552024

Issues

Next Hearing

23rd June 2026

e-Filing Number

06-09-2024

Filing Number

96/2024

Filing Date

06-09-2024

Registration No

65/2024

Registration Date

06-09-2024

Court

CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade

Judge

1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

Ananda Mahadev Patil

Adv. Vikrant Shamrao Patil

Respondent(s)

Sampatrao Sitaram Dinde Advocate - Prashant J. Patil

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

10-03-2026

Issues

18-02-2026

Issues

17-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

13-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

09-12-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

17-02-2026
Order on T.I.

Summary This is a Regular Civil Suit (Case No. 65/2024) from a Junior Civil Court in Kolhapur, Maharashtra, concerning a land dispute in Padel village. The court granted a temporary injunction (तुर्तातुर्त माई - Tutaraturt Maai) in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendant from selling, transferring, or interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the disputed agricultural property. The court found that the plaintiff had established a prima facie right based on historical possession records dating back to 1948 and directed that the final relief be issued pending the main judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a Regular Civil Suit (Case No. 65/2024) from a Junior Civil Court in Kolhapur, Maharashtra, concerning a land dispute in Padel village. The court granted a temporary injunction (तुर्तातुर्त माई - Tutaraturt Maai) in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendant from selling, transferring, or interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the disputed agricultural property. The court found that the plaintiff had established a prima facie right based on historical possession records dating back to 1948 and directed that the final relief be issued pending the main judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case