Ananda Mahadev Patil vs Sampatrao Sitaram Dinde Advocate - Prashant J. Patil — 65/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO200003552024
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
06-09-2024
Filing Number
96/2024
Filing Date
06-09-2024
Registration No
65/2024
Registration Date
06-09-2024
Court
CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ananda Mahadev Patil
Adv. Vikrant Shamrao Patil
Respondent(s)
Sampatrao Sitaram Dinde Advocate - Prashant J. Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Issues
Issues
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Issues |
| 18-02-2026 | Issues |
| 17-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 13-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 09-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a Regular Civil Suit (Case No. 65/2024) from a Junior Civil Court in Kolhapur, Maharashtra, concerning a land dispute in Padel village. The court granted a temporary injunction (तुर्तातुर्त माई - Tutaraturt Maai) in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendant from selling, transferring, or interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the disputed agricultural property. The court found that the plaintiff had established a prima facie right based on historical possession records dating back to 1948 and directed that the final relief be issued pending the main judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a Regular Civil Suit (Case No. 65/2024) from a Junior Civil Court in Kolhapur, Maharashtra, concerning a land dispute in Padel village. The court granted a temporary injunction (तुर्तातुर्त माई - Tutaraturt Maai) in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendant from selling, transferring, or interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the disputed agricultural property. The court found that the plaintiff had established a prima facie right based on historical possession records dating back to 1948 and directed that the final relief be issued pending the main judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts