State of Maharashtra vs Yashwant Babu Kamble Advocate - Vikrant Shamrao Patil — 47/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,149,324,323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO200002602022

Filing Number

176/2022

Filing Date

28-Jul-2022

Registration No

47/2022

Registration Date

28-Jul-2022

Court

CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade

Judge

1-Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 11-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

100

Police Station

Shahuwadi Police Station

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,149,324,323,504,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Yashwant Babu Kamble Advocate - Vikrant Shamrao Patil

  2. 2.Dilip Tukaram Phatak

  3. 3.Prakash Tukaram Phatak

  4. 4.Darshana Dilip Phatak

  5. 5.Ashwini Ashok Phatak

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Kale-Kheriwaade (Kolhapur district) acquitted all five accused persons of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 143, 147, 323, 324, 504, 506, and 149 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused participated in an unlawful assembly or committed violent acts against the complainant on April 6, 2021, despite witness testimonies and investigation findings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Disposed

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  6. 04-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  8. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  9. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  10. 30-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  11. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  12. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  13. 17-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  14. 18-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

  15. 16-Dec-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  16. 10-Oct-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  17. 05-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  18. 22-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  19. 27-May-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  20. 26-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  21. 13-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  22. 28-Nov-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

  23. 03-Oct-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

  24. 22-Aug-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

  25. 06-Jul-2023

    Hearing

  26. 08-May-2023

    Hearing

    Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  27. 28-Mar-2023

    Hearing

    Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  28. 24-Jan-2023

    Hearing

    Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  29. 06-Dec-2022

    Hearing

    Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  30. 19-Oct-2022

    Hearing

    Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  31. 08-Sep-2022

    ChargeView PDF

  32. 08-Sep-2022

    Hearing

    Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  33. 28-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 28-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 47/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Kale-Kheriwaade (Kolhapur district) acquitted all five accused persons of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 143, 147, 323, 324, 504, 506, and 149 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused participated in an unlawful assembly or committed violent acts against the complainant on April 6, 2021, despite witness testimonies and investigation findings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case