State of Maharashtra vs Sagar Ananda Patil Advocate - Vikrant Shamrao Patil — 52/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354,354a,354b,294,352,323,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO200002582021
Filing Number
203/2021
Filing Date
09-Aug-2021
Registration No
52/2021
Registration Date
09-Aug-2021
Court
CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade
Judge
1-Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
58
Police Station
Kale Police Station, Kale
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sagar Ananda Patil Advocate - Vikrant Shamrao Patil
-
2.Tejaswini Sagar Patil
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary of Case 52/2021 The court acquitted both defendants (Sagar Ananda Patil and Tejaswini Sagar Patil) of charges under IPC sections 354(b), 323, 504, 506 and 34. The judge found insufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendants assaulted, abused, or sexually harassed the complainant on April 24, 2021. While the complainant testified about alleged assault and use of chili powder, the court determined that the prosecution's case was weakened by inconsistent witness testimony and prior disputes between the parties over financial matters within a savings group. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-May-2026
Disposed
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
30-Apr-2026
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
06-Apr-2026
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
16-Mar-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
04-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
04-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
11-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
10-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
29-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
20-Feb-2025
Evidence Part Heard
-
16-Dec-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
24-Oct-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
10-Sep-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
23-Jul-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
18-Jun-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
16-Apr-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
07-Mar-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
11-Jan-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
04-Jan-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
23-Nov-2023
Evidence Part Heard
-
26-Sep-2023
Evidence Part Heard
-
25-Jul-2023
Hearing
-
13-Jun-2023
Hearing
-
11-Apr-2023
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
18-Mar-2023
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
31-Jan-2023
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
20-Dec-2022
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
10-Nov-2022
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
11-Oct-2022
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
29-Sep-2022
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
29-Aug-2022
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
16-Jul-2022
ChargeView PDF
-
16-Jul-2022
Hearing
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
19-Apr-2022
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
25-Feb-2022
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
20-Dec-2021
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
13-Nov-2021
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
14-Oct-2021
Charge
Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
-
09-Aug-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Aug-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 52/2021
Summary of Case 52/2021 The court acquitted both defendants (Sagar Ananda Patil and Tejaswini Sagar Patil) of charges under IPC sections 354(b), 323, 504, 506 and 34. The judge found insufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendants assaulted, abused, or sexually harassed the complainant on April 24, 2021. While the complainant testified about alleged assault and use of chili powder, the court determined that the prosecution's case was weakened by inconsistent witness testimony and prior disputes between the parties over financial matters within a savings group. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts