Ramchandra Dagdu Patil vs Sonabai Tatoba Patil Advocate - Y. P. Ugave — 42/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22,34,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO200002532024
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
05-07-2024
Filing Number
68/2024
Filing Date
06-07-2024
Registration No
42/2024
Registration Date
06-07-2024
Court
CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramchandra Dagdu Patil
Adv. Shahaji S. Patil
Anil Dagadu Patil
Adv. SHAHAJI PATIL
Sakhubai Dagadu Patil
Adv. SHAHAJI PATIL
Dipali Shamrao Patil
Adv. SHAHAJI PATIL
Sushama Shamarao Patil Minor Gardian of Plaintiff No.4 Dipali Shamrao Patil called as mother
Adv. SHAHAJI PATIL
Gita Shamrao PatilMinor Gardian of Plaintiff No.4 Dipali Shamrao Patil called as mother
Adv. SHAHAJI PATIL
Respondent(s)
Sonabai Tatoba Patil Advocate - Y. P. Ugave
Hausabai Raghunath Gurav
Adv. S. V. Khot
Shalabai Balu Urf Juga Patil
Adv. S. V. Khot
Surekha Balu Urf Juga Patil
Ashok Dhondiram Patil
Paramveer Dhondiram Patil
Mandabai Dhondiram Patil
Neeta Anil Mitake
Balu Bhau Gurav
Shankar Bhau Gurav
Gangubai Vishnu Gurav
Sarajabai Sadashiv Gurav
Malubai Aananda Gurav
Shalabai Ashok Gurav
Anil Mahadev Jadhav
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 17-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 27-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 16-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 16-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by defendant Nos. 5 to 8 and 15 to set aside the "No Written Statement" order against them has been allowed. The court set aside the "No W.S." order and permitted these defendants to file their written statements upon payment of Rs. 300/- as cost to the plaintiffs, finding that allowing late filing would enable merit-based adjudication without causing serious prejudice to the opposing party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by defendant Nos. 5 to 8 and 15 to set aside the "No Written Statement" order against them has been allowed. The court set aside the "No W.S." order and permitted these defendants to file their written statements upon payment of Rs. 300/- as cost to the plaintiffs, finding that allowing late filing would enable merit-based adjudication without causing serious prejudice to the opposing party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts