Ramchandra Dagdu Patil vs Sonabai Tatoba Patil Advocate - Y. P. Ugave — 42/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22,34,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 16-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO200002532024

e-Filing Number

05-07-2024

Filing Number

68/2024

Filing Date

06-Jul-2024

Registration No

42/2024

Registration Date

06-Jul-2024

Court

CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade

Judge

1-Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 22,34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ramchandra Dagdu Patil

    Adv. Shahaji S. Patil

  2. 2.Anil Dagadu Patil

    Adv. SHAHAJI PATIL

  3. 3.Sakhubai Dagadu Patil

    Adv. SHAHAJI PATIL

  4. 4.Dipali Shamrao Patil

    Adv. SHAHAJI PATIL

  5. 5.Sushama Shamarao Patil Minor Gardian of Plaintiff No.4 Dipali Shamrao Patil called as mother

    Adv. SHAHAJI PATIL

  6. 6.Gita Shamrao PatilMinor Gardian of Plaintiff No.4 Dipali Shamrao Patil called as mother

    Adv. SHAHAJI PATIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sonabai Tatoba Patil Advocate - Y. P. Ugave

  2. 2.Hausabai Raghunath Gurav

    Adv. S. V. Khot

  3. 3.Shalabai Balu Urf Juga Patil

    Adv. S. V. Khot

  4. 4.Surekha Balu Urf Juga Patil

  5. 5.Ashok Dhondiram Patil

  6. 6.Paramveer Dhondiram Patil

  7. 7.Mandabai Dhondiram Patil

  8. 8.Neeta Anil Mitake

  9. 9.Balu Bhau Gurav

  10. 10.Shankar Bhau Gurav

  11. 11.Gangubai Vishnu Gurav

  12. 12.Sarajabai Sadashiv Gurav

  13. 13.Malubai Aananda Gurav

  14. 14.Shalabai Ashok Gurav

  15. 15.Anil Mahadev Jadhav

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  3. 17-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  4. 27-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  5. 16-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  6. 16-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  7. 18-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  8. 28-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  9. 25-Sep-2025

    For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  10. 28-Aug-2025

    For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  11. 28-Jul-2025

    For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  12. 23-Jun-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  13. 21-Apr-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  14. 17-Mar-2025

    W.S. and Say

  15. 20-Jan-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The application filed by defendant Nos. 5 to 8 and 15 to set aside the "No Written Statement" order against them has been allowed. The court set aside the "No W.S." order and permitted these defendants to file their written statements upon payment of Rs. 300/- as cost to the plaintiffs, finding that allowing late filing would enable merit-based adjudication without causing serious prejudice to the opposing party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 20-Jan-2025

    W.S. and Say

  17. 20-Jan-2025

    W.S. and Say

  18. 18-Nov-2024

    W.S. and Say

  19. 21-Oct-2024

    W.S. and Say

  20. 02-Sep-2024

    W.S. and Say

  21. 16-Aug-2024

    W.S. and Say

  22. 12-Aug-2024

    W.S. and Say

  23. 18-Jul-2024

    W.S. and Say

  24. 08-Jul-2024

    Awaiting Notice

  25. 06-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 06-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 42/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application filed by defendant Nos. 5 to 8 and 15 to set aside the "No Written Statement" order against them has been allowed. The court set aside the "No W.S." order and permitted these defendants to file their written statements upon payment of Rs. 300/- as cost to the plaintiffs, finding that allowing late filing would enable merit-based adjudication without causing serious prejudice to the opposing party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case