State of Maharashtra vs Dhondiram Dattatray Atigre Advocate - Vikrant Shamrao Patil — 51/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,504,34. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO200002332021
Next Hearing
12th May 2026
Filing Number
182/2021
Filing Date
19-07-2021
Registration No
51/2021
Registration Date
19-07-2021
Court
CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
FIR Details
FIR Number
89
Police Station
Shahuwadi Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P
Respondent(s)
Dhondiram Dattatray Atigre Advocate - Vikrant Shamrao Patil
Dattatray Dhondi Atigre
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate charged two accused persons—Dhondiram Dattatray Atigre (age 36) and Dattatray Dhondi Atigre (age 56)—under IPC sections 324 (voluntarily causing hurt with dangerous weapon) and 504 (insult with intent to provoke breach of peace), both read with section 34 (common intention), for an incident on 31.03.2021 where they allegedly injured the informant with an iron rod and verbally provoked witnesses. The accused pleaded not guilty and claimed trial, and the court directed the case to proceed to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate charged two accused persons—Dhondiram Dattatray Atigre (age 36) and Dattatray Dhondi Atigre (age 56)—under IPC sections 324 (voluntarily causing hurt with dangerous weapon) and 504 (insult with intent to provoke breach of peace), both read with section 34 (common intention), for an incident on 31.03.2021 where they allegedly injured the informant with an iron rod and verbally provoked witnesses. The accused pleaded not guilty and claimed trial, and the court directed the case to proceed to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts