State of Maharashtra vs Ajit Mahadev Gurav Advocate - S. V. Khot — 33/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,324,323,504. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO200001822022
Filing Number
117/2022
Filing Date
26-05-2022
Registration No
33/2022
Registration Date
26-05-2022
Court
CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Decision Date
12th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Ajit Mahadev Gurav Advocate - S. V. Khot
Uttam @ Gotya Mahadev Gurav
Adv. S. V. Khot
Ganesh Baban Gurav
Adv. S. V. Khot
Mahadev Dnyanu Gurav
Adv. S. V. Khot
Baban Dnyanu Gurav
Adv. S. V. Khot
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Disposed
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 08-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
CASE SUMMARY The court acquitted all five defendants of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 143, 147, 323, 324, and 504 (read with section 149). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the alleged offenses. Although the complainant testified about the incident, the defendants later settled their disputes with the complainant outside court, undermining the case. The court found insufficient credible evidence to sustain the conviction, resulting in the acquittal of all five accused persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY The court acquitted all five defendants of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 143, 147, 323, 324, and 504 (read with section 149). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the alleged offenses. Although the complainant testified about the incident, the defendants later settled their disputes with the complainant outside court, undermining the case. The court found insufficient credible evidence to sustain the conviction, resulting in the acquittal of all five accused persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts