State of Maharashtra vs Ajit Mahadev Gurav Advocate - S. V. Khot — 33/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,324,323,504. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th May 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO200001822022

Case disposed

Filing Number

117/2022

Filing Date

26-05-2022

Registration No

33/2022

Registration Date

26-05-2022

Court

CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade

Judge

1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

Decision Date

12th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 143,147,324,323,504
Bombay Police Act Section 135

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

Ajit Mahadev Gurav Advocate - S. V. Khot

Uttam @ Gotya Mahadev Gurav

Adv. S. V. Khot

Ganesh Baban Gurav

Adv. S. V. Khot

Mahadev Dnyanu Gurav

Adv. S. V. Khot

Baban Dnyanu Gurav

Adv. S. V. Khot

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

12-05-2026

Disposed

06-04-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

16-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

09-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

08-12-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Final Orders / Judgements

12-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

CASE SUMMARY The court acquitted all five defendants of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 143, 147, 323, 324, and 504 (read with section 149). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the alleged offenses. Although the complainant testified about the incident, the defendants later settled their disputes with the complainant outside court, undermining the case. The court found insufficient credible evidence to sustain the conviction, resulting in the acquittal of all five accused persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

20-07-2022
Charge
casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY The court acquitted all five defendants of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 143, 147, 323, 324, and 504 (read with section 149). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the alleged offenses. Although the complainant testified about the incident, the defendants later settled their disputes with the complainant outside court, undermining the case. The court found insufficient credible evidence to sustain the conviction, resulting in the acquittal of all five accused persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case