State of Maharashtra vs Ajit Mahadev Gurav Advocate - S. V. Khot — 33/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,324,323,504. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO200001822022

Filing Number

117/2022

Filing Date

26-May-2022

Registration No

33/2022

Registration Date

26-May-2022

Court

CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade

Judge

1-Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,324,323,504
Bombay Police Act Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ajit Mahadev Gurav Advocate - S. V. Khot

  2. 2.Uttam @ Gotya Mahadev Gurav

    Adv. S. V. Khot

  3. 3.Ganesh Baban Gurav

    Adv. S. V. Khot

  4. 4.Mahadev Dnyanu Gurav

    Adv. S. V. Khot

  5. 5.Baban Dnyanu Gurav

    Adv. S. V. Khot

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  3. 12-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY The court acquitted all five defendants of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 143, 147, 323, 324, and 504 (read with section 149). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the alleged offenses. Although the complainant testified about the incident, the defendants later settled their disputes with the complainant outside court, undermining the case. The court found insufficient credible evidence to sustain the conviction, resulting in the acquittal of all five accused persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-May-2026

    Disposed

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  8. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  9. 22-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  10. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  11. 05-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  12. 08-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  13. 29-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  14. 03-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

  15. 26-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  16. 24-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  17. 06-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  18. 13-Jun-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  19. 16-Apr-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  20. 26-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  21. 02-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  22. 21-Nov-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

  23. 10-Oct-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

  24. 07-Oct-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

  25. 25-Sep-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

  26. 18-Aug-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

  27. 07-Jul-2023

    Hearing

  28. 29-May-2023

    Hearing

    Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  29. 22-May-2023

    Hearing

    Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  30. 28-Mar-2023

    Hearing

    Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  31. 30-Jan-2023

    Hearing

    Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  32. 03-Dec-2022

    Hearing

    Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  33. 12-Oct-2022

    Hearing

    Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  34. 03-Sep-2022

    Hearing

    Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  35. 18-Aug-2022

    Hearing

    Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  36. 20-Jul-2022

    ChargeView PDF

  37. 20-Jul-2022

    Hearing

    Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  38. 26-May-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 26-May-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 33/2022

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY The court acquitted all five defendants of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 143, 147, 323, 324, and 504 (read with section 149). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the alleged offenses. Although the complainant testified about the incident, the defendants later settled their disputes with the complainant outside court, undermining the case. The court found insufficient credible evidence to sustain the conviction, resulting in the acquittal of all five accused persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case