State of Maharashtra vs Pradip alias Banda Dhondiram Desai Advocate - Vikrant Shamrao Patil — 48/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 304A,279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO200001652022

Filing Number

105/2022

Filing Date

06-May-2022

Registration No

48/2022

Registration Date

06-May-2022

Court

CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade

Judge

1-Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

19

Police Station

Kale Police Station, Kale

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 304A,279,337,338
Motor Vehicles Act Section 184,223/177,134(A)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A. P. P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pradip alias Banda Dhondiram Desai Advocate - Vikrant Shamrao Patil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Pradip alias Banda Dhondiram Desai The court acquitted the defendant of charges under IPC sections 304(a), 279, 338 and Motor Vehicles Act sections 184, 134(a)(b), 223/177 in a fatal hit-and-run case. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant's negligent driving of a Tata 407 tempo caused a one-year-old girl's death, as the evidence remained circumstantial and the complainant and defendant settled the dispute amicably. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Disposed

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  7. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  8. 22-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  9. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  10. 05-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  11. 09-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  12. 08-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  13. 29-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  14. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

  15. 21-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  16. 26-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  17. 13-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  18. 13-Jun-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  19. 16-Apr-2024

    Hearing

  20. 26-Feb-2024

    Hearing

  21. 02-Jan-2024

    Hearing

  22. 21-Nov-2023

    Hearing

  23. 10-Oct-2023

    Hearing

  24. 24-Aug-2023

    Hearing

  25. 06-Jul-2023

    Hearing

  26. 06-May-2023

    Hearing

    Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  27. 06-Apr-2023

    Hearing

    Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  28. 28-Mar-2023

    Hearing

    Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  29. 30-Jan-2023

    Hearing

    Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  30. 01-Dec-2022

    Hearing

    Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  31. 11-Oct-2022

    Hearing

    Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  32. 03-Sep-2022

    Hearing

    Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  33. 04-Aug-2022

    Hearing

    Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  34. 13-Jul-2022

    Hearing

    Extra Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  35. 06-May-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 06-May-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 48/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Pradip alias Banda Dhondiram Desai The court acquitted the defendant of charges under IPC sections 304(a), 279, 338 and Motor Vehicles Act sections 184, 134(a)(b), 223/177 in a fatal hit-and-run case. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant's negligent driving of a Tata 407 tempo caused a one-year-old girl's death, as the evidence remained circumstantial and the complainant and defendant settled the dispute amicably. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case