Santram Kedari Kamble (Mahar) vs Ashok Kedari Kamble (Mahar) Advocate - V. T. Patil — 27/2021

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37,39. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO200001512021

Evidence

Next Hearing

30th June 2026

Filing Number

35/2021

Filing Date

30-04-2021

Registration No

27/2021

Registration Date

03-05-2021

Court

CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade

Judge

1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 37,39

Petitioner(s)

Santram Kedari Kamble (Mahar)

Adv. Shahaji S. Patil

Baliram Kedari Kamble (Mahar)

Respondent(s)

Ashok Kedari Kamble (Mahar) Advocate - V. T. Patil

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

21-04-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

20-01-2026

Evidence

25-11-2025

Evidence

14-10-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

22-06-2021
Order on T.I.
24-03-2022
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary The court allowed the plaintiffs' application to amend their pleadings under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC, subject to costs of Rs. 200/- payable to the defendant. The amendment seeks to add allegations that the defendant's construction is illegal and to include a prayer for mandatory injunction for demolition of the structure on the disputed ancestral property. The court found the amendment necessary to determine the real controversy between the parties and directed the plaintiffs to finalize amendments within 14 days and deposit required court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court allowed the plaintiffs' application to amend their pleadings under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC, subject to costs of Rs. 200/- payable to the defendant. The amendment seeks to add allegations that the defendant's construction is illegal and to include a prayer for mandatory injunction for demolition of the structure on the disputed ancestral property. The court found the amendment necessary to determine the real controversy between the parties and directed the plaintiffs to finalize amendments within 14 days and deposit required court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case