State of Maharashtra vs Jaywant Nivrutti Patil Advocate - N. B. Mane — 22/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th May 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO200001452023

Case disposed

Filing Number

109/2023

Filing Date

11-04-2023

Registration No

22/2023

Registration Date

11-04-2023

Court

CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade

Judge

1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

Decision Date

11th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

123

Police Station

Panhala Police Station

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 324,323,504,506

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

Jaywant Nivrutti Patil Advocate - N. B. Mane

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

11-05-2026

Disposed

28-04-2026

Arguments

01-04-2026

Arguments

27-03-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

16-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Final Orders / Judgements

11-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Jaywant Nivrutti Patil Court Decision: The defendant Jaywant Nivrutti Patil was acquitted of all charges under IPC sections 323, 324, 504, and 506. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations of voluntarily causing hurt with a wooden spade during a land dispute with the complainant. Key Reasoning: Although the complainant and three witnesses testified about an alleged assault over a shared agricultural boundary dispute, the court determined the prosecution's evidence was insufficient. Inconsistencies in witness accounts and lack of corroborating physical evidence undermined the charges, leading to the defendant's acquittal under CrPC section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

02-08-2023
Charge
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Jaywant Nivrutti Patil Court Decision: The defendant Jaywant Nivrutti Patil was acquitted of all charges under IPC sections 323, 324, 504, and 506. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations of voluntarily causing hurt with a wooden spade during a land dispute with the complainant. Key Reasoning: Although the complainant and three witnesses testified about an alleged assault over a shared agricultural boundary dispute, the court determined the prosecution's evidence was insufficient. Inconsistencies in witness accounts and lack of corroborating physical evidence undermined the charges, leading to the defendant's acquittal under CrPC section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case