State of Maharashtra vs Jaywant Nivrutti Patil Advocate - N. B. Mane — 22/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO200001452023

Filing Number

109/2023

Filing Date

11-Apr-2023

Registration No

22/2023

Registration Date

11-Apr-2023

Court

CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade

Judge

1-Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

123

Police Station

Panhala Police Station

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jaywant Nivrutti Patil Advocate - N. B. Mane

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Jaywant Nivrutti Patil Court Decision: The defendant Jaywant Nivrutti Patil was acquitted of all charges under IPC sections 323, 324, 504, and 506. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations of voluntarily causing hurt with a wooden spade during a land dispute with the complainant. Key Reasoning: Although the complainant and three witnesses testified about an alleged assault over a shared agricultural boundary dispute, the court determined the prosecution's evidence was insufficient. Inconsistencies in witness accounts and lack of corroborating physical evidence undermined the charges, leading to the defendant's acquittal under CrPC section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Disposed

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  9. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  10. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  11. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  12. 23-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC Kale-Kherivade

  13. 17-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

  14. 20-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

  15. 16-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  16. 23-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  17. 30-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  18. 24-Jun-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  19. 26-Apr-2024

    Hearing

  20. 23-Feb-2024

    Hearing

  21. 23-Jan-2024

    Hearing

  22. 04-Dec-2023

    Hearing

  23. 18-Oct-2023

    Hearing

  24. 30-Aug-2023

    Hearing

  25. 02-Aug-2023

    ChargeView PDF

  26. 02-Aug-2023

    Hearing

  27. 14-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Summons

  28. 12-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 11-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 22/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Jaywant Nivrutti Patil Court Decision: The defendant Jaywant Nivrutti Patil was acquitted of all charges under IPC sections 323, 324, 504, and 506. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations of voluntarily causing hurt with a wooden spade during a land dispute with the complainant. Key Reasoning: Although the complainant and three witnesses testified about an alleged assault over a shared agricultural boundary dispute, the court determined the prosecution's evidence was insufficient. Inconsistencies in witness accounts and lack of corroborating physical evidence undermined the charges, leading to the defendant's acquittal under CrPC section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case