Mansing Ananda Patil vs Savitri alias Anusaya Gundu Kapase Advocate - R. D. Thakur — 42/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO200001432022
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
53/2022
Filing Date
11-04-2022
Registration No
42/2022
Registration Date
19-04-2022
Court
CJJD and JMFC, Kale-Kheriwade
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mansing Ananda Patil
Adv. S. V. Khot
Respondent(s)
Savitri alias Anusaya Gundu Kapase Advocate - R. D. Thakur
Sharada Bhagwane Mole
Manisha Sambhaji Jadhav
Sadashiv Vishnu Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Kale-Kherivade
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Steps
Steps
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 27-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 16-12-2025 | Steps |
| 04-11-2025 | Steps |
| 16-09-2025 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a Maharashtra civil court order (R.C.S. No. 42/2022) regarding a property dispute involving cancellation of a deed (sale deed No. 1386/2019). The court allowed the petition filed by the plaintiff, accepting the application under CPC Order 7 Rule 11. The court found that the defendants had not paid the requisite court fees and stamp duty as per the Bombay Court Fees Act, Section 6(HA), and therefore directed that the necessary fees be collected before the suit could proceed further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a Maharashtra civil court order (R.C.S. No. 42/2022) regarding a property dispute involving cancellation of a deed (sale deed No. 1386/2019). The court allowed the petition filed by the plaintiff, accepting the application under CPC Order 7 Rule 11. The court found that the defendants had not paid the requisite court fees and stamp duty as per the Bombay Court Fees Act, Section 6(HA), and therefore directed that the necessary fees be collected before the suit could proceed further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts